69 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
69 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
# RC-014: Review of BC-001 (screenshot)
|
||
|
||
## Metadata
|
||
| Key | Value |
|
||
| --- | --- |
|
||
| ID | RC-014 |
|
||
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001], [DICT-001] |
|
||
|
||
## Version History
|
||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||
|
||
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
|
||
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] and, for the language and domain, [QC-LANG-001]
|
||
- Scope: full review. Objective 13, scope items, success criterion 14, two risks, an assumption and the cost changed, so a delta re-review is not allowed. Earlier record: [RC-001].
|
||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the assistant also drafted the change)
|
||
|
||
## Checklist Results
|
||
|
||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost–Benefit Assessment is still qualitative and justified; the cost row now names two more days for the screenshot. |
|
||
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Risks table has 13 rows, each with an Impact and a Mitigation; the two new rows cover the real-window capture and a screenshot that goes out of date. |
|
||
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Success Criteria has 14 rows; row 14 states observable targets (the file, the text `Score: 5` followed by a high score, the README, three wiki pages, HTTP 200 with an image). |
|
||
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` has the screenshot; `### Out of Scope` names a capture tool in the repository. |
|
||
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and states interests only; objective numbers are extended to 13. |
|
||
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation is unchanged. |
|
||
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | The new assumption is in Assumptions; Constraints are unchanged (window still ends 2026-10-25). |
|
||
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation is unchanged and unambiguous: "Proceed". |
|
||
|
||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||
|
||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` in Metadata. |
|
||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of BC-001, including the new and changed text and the new Version History row, are English. |
|
||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is the one the registry gives for the type. |
|
||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of [DICT-001], including the new row `screenshot`, which is the word of S01's request and names the one file `docs/images/snake-score-5.png`. |
|
||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` holds one file per artifact; there is no `<name>.<language>.md`. |
|
||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | Language and domain are unchanged since the previous accepted version. |
|
||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against [DICT-001]. |
|
||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | No new abbreviation is introduced; PNG and HTTP are standard names. |
|
||
|
||
## Overall Verdict
|
||
|
||
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. Assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the change, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode. Mode: autonomous, not independent. S01 accepted the plan that contains this change in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
|
||
|
||
## Action Items
|
||
|
||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| Challenge this `Go` in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted | S01 | 2026-10-20 |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
|
||
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
|
||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|