5.4 KiB
5.4 KiB
RC-014: Review of BC-001 (screenshot)
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-014 |
| CrossReference | BC-001, QC-BC-001, QC-LANG-001, DICT-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | 988ebba |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: BC-001
- Checklist used: QC-BC-001 and, for the language and domain, QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review. Objective 13, scope items, success criterion 14, two risks, an assumption and the cost changed, so a delta re-review is not allowed. Earlier record: [RC-001].
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01; the assistant also drafted the change)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost–Benefit Assessment is still qualitative and justified; the cost row now names two more days for the screenshot. |
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Risks table has 13 rows, each with an Impact and a Mitigation; the two new rows cover the real-window capture and a screenshot that goes out of date. |
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Success Criteria has 14 rows; row 14 states observable targets (the file, the text Score: 5 followed by a high score, the README, three wiki pages, HTTP 200 with an image). |
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | ### In Scope has the screenshot; ### Out of Scope names a capture tool in the repository. |
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and states interests only; objective numbers are extended to 13. |
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation is unchanged. |
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | The new assumption is in Assumptions; Constraints are unchanged (window still ends 2026-10-25). |
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation is unchanged and unambiguous: "Proceed". |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Language is en and Domain is it in Metadata. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of BC-001, including the new and changed text and the new Version History row, are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is the one the registry gives for the type. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of DICT-001, including the new row screenshot, which is the word of S01's request and names the one file docs/images/snake-score-5.png. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | docs/ holds one file per artifact; there is no <name>.<language>.md. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | Language and domain are unchanged since the previous accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against DICT-001. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | No new abbreviation is introduced; PNG and HTTP are standard names. |
Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. Assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the change, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode. Mode: autonomous, not independent. S01 accepted the plan that contains this change in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
Challenge this Go in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted |
S01 | 2026-10-20 |