Tirsvad
93d8321762
Mount the SQA/QC framework and add BC-001, SA-001, PP-001, MIL-001 to MIL-008, review records RC-001 to RC-010 and the traceability matrix. Task: MIL-001#1 Task: MIL-001#2
67 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
67 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
# Review of MIL-004
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-006 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [MIL-004], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-004]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001]
|
|
- Also applied: [QC-LANG-001]
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it
|
|
- Language reviewer: none
|
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the author is S01)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate (Mandatory) | Pass | Deliverable section names a concrete, tangible output. |
|
|
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate (Mandatory) | Pass | Go / No-Go table has objectively checkable criteria with a Go and a No-Go outcome. |
|
|
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped (Optional) | Pass | Dependencies table names the previous milestone (or None for the first). |
|
|
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI (Mandatory) | Pass | Traceability table cites BC-001 objectives. |
|
|
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified (Mandatory) | Pass | Ownership table names S01 as owner and approving reviewer. |
|
|
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints (Mandatory) | Pass | Target Date is inside the two-week window PP-001 plans from BC-001 (no explicit deadline, see PP-001 Open Issues). |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder (Mandatory) | Pass | Metadata has Language = en and Domain = it, neither a placeholder. |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list (Mandatory) | Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry domain list. |
|
|
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language (Mandatory) | Pass | All prose and table cells are English, the stated language. Code names stay as written. |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type (Mandatory) | Pass | IT Executive English register: short sentences, decisions and outcomes first; implementation names appear only where a task needs them. |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms (Mandatory) | Pass | No domain dictionary (DICT) exists in this project. Terms (car, player, level, finish line, milestone) are used with one word each, matching the assignment. Recorded as a stand-in decision. |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English (Mandatory) | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document (Mandatory) | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document. |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again (Mandatory) | Pass | First version; no language change since the previous accepted version. |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly (Mandatory) | Pass | The reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain; stand-in for S01 (who is the PO and developer). No separate language reviewer. Open to challenge by S01. |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language (Optional) | Pass | Abbreviations (SQA, QC, CI, RC, API, FURPS+) are spelled out on first use; stakeholder and document IDs are defined in SA-001. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go - every Mandatory criterion of QC-MIL-001 and QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is not independent: author and reviewer are the same person, with the AI standing in for S01.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| Challenge this review in the end-of-run summary if the stand-in decisions on QC-LANG-001 criteria 5 and 9 are not accepted | S01 | 2026-10-27 |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[MIL-004]: ../../milestones/mil-004-cars.md
|
|
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
|
|
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|