Tirsvad
f13d004447
Adds the Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Domain Dictionary, Project Plan and milestones MIL-001 to MIL-003, with the review records RC-001 to RC-006 (all Go). The repository starts from the finished main of 020-snake-game, as S01 decided on 2026-10-08. The milestones and their 22 issues were synced to the git host.
5.4 KiB
5.4 KiB
RC-006: Review of MIL-003
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-006 |
| CrossReference | MIL-003, QC-MIL-001, QC-LANG-001, BC-001, DICT-001, PP-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-003
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 and, for the language and domain, QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section defines the comparison table and lists the ten lecture points that are its specification, each with the place in the code. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Fourteen Go/No-Go rows, each with a command or an observable result; the comparison with the video (criterion 13) is checkable because an undocumented difference is the No-Go. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table: MIL-002 accepted and merged, because the game that is checked exists there. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability table maps to BC-001 objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 and Success Criteria 1 to 7, 10 and 11, and records the deviation from QC-PY-001 criterion 10. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table: Owner S01, Approving reviewer S01 (same person; see verdict). |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date 2026-10-14; BC-001 Constraints give a plan window ending 2026-10-16, which leaves two buffer days. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Language is en and Domain is it in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry's domain list; check-languages.sh --list shows en and it for this document. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English. Titles of lectures are quoted in English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Executive English: short prose; code names appear in backticks in the lecture-point table because each point must point at the code. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of DICT-001. 'collide' was changed to the dictionary term 'eats' before this review; 'collisions' remains only in the titles of the lectures, which are quoted. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | docs/ holds one file per artifact; there is no <name>.<language>.md. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version; there is no earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | S01 (Product Owner and developer) reads English and knows the IT domain, and asked for this review in chat on 2026-10-08. The terms were also checked against DICT-001 by the reviewing assistant; S01's own reading is an action item below. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | No abbreviation is used that the Business Case does not spell out; the document uses none beyond S01 and the artifact IDs. |
Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass. The checklist rows above were transcribed and assessed on 2026-10-08 by the assistant that drafted the documents, at S01's request in chat ("review them and start MIL-001"). S01 is named as reviewer and approves. This review is not independent: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and reviewer (S01) are one person in a single-person project (risk recorded in BC-001 and PP-001). S01 has not yet read the document line by line and can overrule this verdict at the pull request.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
Read MIL-003 and confirm or overrule this Go before the pull request of MIL-003 is merged |
S01 | 2026-10-14 |
| Supply the lecture video (or its transcript) that the comparison in criterion 13 needs; the request holds only summaries | S01 | 2026-10-14 |
Decide whether to create the governance document (GOV) and the traceability matrix (TM); no TM row could be added for this review because neither exists (open issue in PP-001) |
S01 | 2026-10-14 |