Files
Tirsvad 5568141bf7
CI / checks (push) Successful in 48s
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Resolve pending commit links
Replaces pending in the Version History of the documents with links to the commits that introduced the rows.
2026-10-08 17:47:11 +08:00

5.5 KiB

RC-005: Review of MIL-002

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-005
CrossReference MIL-002, QC-MIL-001, QC-LANG-001, BC-001, DICT-001, PP-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-08 Proposed Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S01 Initial version f13d004

Artifact Under Review

  • Instance reviewed: MIL-002
  • Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 and, for the language and domain, QC-LANG-001
  • Scope: full review
  • Language and domain: en / it
  • Language reviewer: none (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain)

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate Pass Deliverable section lists every source and test file of the game and the command that plays it.
2 Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate Pass Twelve Go/No-Go rows, each with a command or an observable result. The review found no criterion for the README, which would be out of date after the merge; criterion 11 and task 6 were added before this record.
3 Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped Pass Dependencies table: MIL-001 accepted and merged, which provides the package, the constants, the test set-up, the Doxyfile and the CI workflow.
4 Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI Pass Traceability table maps to BC-001 objectives 1 to 5, 7, 8 and 9 and Success Criteria 1 to 5, 7, 9, 10 and 12, and records the deviation from QC-PY-001 criterion 10 (no Design Class Diagram).
5 Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified Pass Ownership table: Owner S01, Approving reviewer S01 (same person; see verdict).
6 Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints Pass Target date 2026-10-12; BC-001 Constraints give a plan window ending 2026-10-16.

Language and Domain Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder Pass Language is en and Domain is it in the Metadata table.
2 Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list Pass en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry's domain list; check-languages.sh --list shows en and it for this document.
3 The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language Pass All prose and table cells are English. Titles of lectures are quoted in English.
4 The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type Pass Register is IT Executive English: short prose; code names and commands appear in backticks only where a task or a check needs them.
5 Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms Pass Terms are those of DICT-001. The synonym search found none outside backticks and quoted lecture titles.
6 Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English Pass Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7 No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document Pass docs/ holds one file per artifact; there is no <name>.<language>.md.
8 A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again N-A First version; there is no earlier accepted version.
9 A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly Pass S01 (Product Owner and developer) reads English and knows the IT domain, and asked for this review in chat on 2026-10-08. The terms were also checked against DICT-001 by the reviewing assistant; S01's own reading is an action item below.
10 Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language Pass Continuous integration (CI) is spelled out on first use (fixed before this review).

Overall Verdict

Go — all Mandatory criteria pass. The checklist rows above were transcribed and assessed on 2026-10-08 by the assistant that drafted the documents, at S01's request in chat ("review them and start MIL-001"). S01 is named as reviewer and approves. This review is not independent: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and reviewer (S01) are one person in a single-person project (risk recorded in BC-001 and PP-001). S01 has not yet read the document line by line and can overrule this verdict at the pull request.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
Read MIL-002 and confirm or overrule this Go before the pull request of MIL-002 is merged S01 2026-10-12
Review the MIL-002 code against QC-PY-001 and record the result as a separate RC-* before the pull request (Go/No-Go criterion 10) S01 2026-10-12
Decide whether to create the governance document (GOV) and the traceability matrix (TM); no TM row could be added for this review because neither exists (open issue in PP-001) S01 2026-10-12