Tirsvad
cd85bb4259
Fix the defects found (cost-benefit justification, delivery-time constraint, spelled-out abbreviations) and add review records RC-005 to RC-007 for the Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis and milestone MIL-001, all with verdict Go.
65 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
# SQA Review Record
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-007 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [MIL-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-07 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] (`qc-milestones-gateways.md`) and [QC-LANG-001] (`qc-language-domain.md`)
|
|
- Scope: full review. It replaces [RC-003], which was written when the checklists were not available in `framework/qc/`. Defects found were fixed first, so the version reviewed is the one with the new Version History row.
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it
|
|
- Language reviewer: none (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The project, tests, config and repository metadata, not just a date |
|
|
| 2 | Explicit, objectively checkable Go/No-Go criteria | Pass | Six criteria, each with a Go and a No-Go condition that a command or page shows |
|
|
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are mapped | Pass | The table lists [BC-001] and [SA-001]; there is no earlier milestone |
|
|
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability table maps O1 to O4 to tasks |
|
|
| 5 | Owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Both are S01 |
|
|
| 6 | Target date is consistent with project constraints | Pass | The first review passed this, but [BC-001] had no delivery-time constraint to check against. [BC-001] now states one week (2026-10-07 to 2026-10-14) and the target date matches |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, neither a placeholder | Pass | `Language` is `en` and `Domain` is `it` |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry's domain list |
|
|
| 3 | The content is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the type | Pass | IT Executive English: Plain executive English |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The project has no dictionary (`DICT`), so there are no PO terms to contradict; terms are used consistently (for example PrettyTable, virtual environment, test) |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Checked in the file |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin exists beside the document | Pass | `docs/` has one file per artifact |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | Language and domain are unchanged since the first version |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain and the language has confirmed the domain terms | Pass | S01 reads English and works in the IT domain; the language reviewer is `none` |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use | Pass | RC is spelled out as the review record in Go criterion 6 (fixed in this review) |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — every mandatory criterion of the type checklist and of QC-LANG-001 passes. One defect was fixed before the verdict: the target date had no Business Case constraint to be consistent with (criterion 6), and the review record was cited as `RC` without explanation (QC-LANG-001 criterion 10). The author and the reviewer are both S01, the only stakeholder, as in the first reviews.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| None open | S01 | n/a |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[MIL-001]: ../../milestones/mil-001-pretty-table-project.md
|
|
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-milestones-gateways.md
|
|
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-language-domain.md
|