SQA Review Record
Metadata
| Key |
Value |
| ID |
RC-002 |
| CrossReference |
SA-001 |
Version History
| Date |
Status |
Author |
Reviewer |
Change |
Commit |
| 2026-10-07 |
Proposed |
Jens Tirsvad Nielsen |
S01 |
Initial version |
c55db0e |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: SA-001
- Checklist used: none available; the
SA reference in the artifact skill (references/SA.md)
- Scope: full review. The QC checklist named in the catalog is not present:
framework/qc/ is empty in this clone. The criteria below are the required sections and rules of the type's references/ file.
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (S01 reads English and knows the domain)
Checklist Results
| # |
Criterion |
Status |
Evidence/Notes |
| 1 |
Purpose |
Pass |
Present and filled in the instance |
| 2 |
Stakeholder Summary Table fully filled |
Pass |
Present and filled in the instance |
| 3 |
Classification Rationale consistent with the table |
Pass |
Present and filled in the instance |
| 4 |
Concerns mapped to FURPS+ |
Pass |
Present and filled in the instance |
| 5 |
Communication Requirements |
Pass |
Present and filled in the instance |
| 6 |
Every conflict has a mitigation |
Pass |
Present and filled in the instance |
| 7 |
Traceability cites BC-001 objectives |
Pass |
Present and filled in the instance |
| 8 |
Sign-Off |
Pass |
Present and filled in the instance |
Language and Domain Results
QC-LANG-001 is not available in this clone. Spot check: the document is in English, in the IT domain, with the Language and Domain rows set, and uses the PO's terms.
Overall Verdict
Go — every required section is present and consistent with the Business Case and Stakeholder Analysis. The author and the reviewer are both S01, the only stakeholder with the authority; the PO explicitly instructed acceptance in chat on 2026-10-07.
Action Items
| Action |
Owner |
Due |
Re-review against the QC checklist once framework/qc/ is populated |
S01 |
when the framework provides it |
