4.0 KiB
4.0 KiB
SQA Review Record
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-007 |
| CrossReference | MIL-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | cd85bb4 |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-001
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 (
qc-milestones-gateways.md) and QC-LANG-001 (qc-language-domain.md) - Scope: full review. It replaces [RC-003], which was written when the checklists were not available in
framework/qc/. Defects found were fixed first, so the version reviewed is the one with the new Version History row. - Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The project, tests, config and repository metadata, not just a date |
| 2 | Explicit, objectively checkable Go/No-Go criteria | Pass | Six criteria, each with a Go and a No-Go condition that a command or page shows |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are mapped | Pass | The table lists [BC-001] and [SA-001]; there is no earlier milestone |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability table maps O1 to O4 to tasks |
| 5 | Owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Both are S01 |
| 6 | Target date is consistent with project constraints | Pass | The first review passed this, but [BC-001] had no delivery-time constraint to check against. [BC-001] now states one week (2026-10-07 to 2026-10-14) and the target date matches |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, neither a placeholder |
Pass | Language is en and Domain is it |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is BCP 47; it is in the registry's domain list |
| 3 | The content is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the type | Pass | IT Executive English: Plain executive English |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The project has no dictionary (DICT), so there are no PO terms to contradict; terms are used consistently (for example PrettyTable, virtual environment, test) |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Checked in the file |
| 7 | No translated twin exists beside the document | Pass | docs/ has one file per artifact |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | Language and domain are unchanged since the first version |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain and the language has confirmed the domain terms | Pass | S01 reads English and works in the IT domain; the language reviewer is none |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use | Pass | RC is spelled out as the review record in Go criterion 6 (fixed in this review) |
Overall Verdict
Go — every mandatory criterion of the type checklist and of QC-LANG-001 passes. One defect was fixed before the verdict: the target date had no Business Case constraint to be consistent with (criterion 6), and the review record was cited as RC without explanation (QC-LANG-001 criterion 10). The author and the reviewer are both S01, the only stakeholder, as in the first reviews.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None open | S01 | n/a |