TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5
28ec0e85d8
Replace `pending` in the Version History of the planning documents and
review records with the link to commit c24f412, and add the framework
gitlink that was missing from that commit.
Refs #1
Refs #2
Refs #3
Refs #4
Refs #5
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.6 KiB
3.6 KiB
Review: Milestone MIL-002
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-004 |
| CrossReference | MIL-002, QC-MIL-001, QC-LANG-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Review record | c24f412 |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-002
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The four modules and the tests. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Criteria are checkable by a command or a file check (pytest, pip install, doxygen, .gitignore). |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Depends on MIL-001, with reason. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Objectives 1 and 2, success criteria 1 and 4. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner and approving reviewer are S01. Same person; accepted for a solo project (see Action Items). |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | 2026-10-14, on or before the BC-001 completion constraint 2026-10-16. |
Language and Domain Results
Checklist: QC-LANG-001.
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | `Language |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is BCP 47; it is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Executive English as the registry states. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (DICT) exists yet; terms (Menu, CoffeeMaker, MoneyMachine, drink, resource) are the assignment's own and used consistently. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Verified by reading the file. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No twin file in docs/. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First accepted version; no language change. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | S01 reads English and works in the IT domain; S01 asked for this review and acceptance in chat. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | PO, FURPS+, CI, PP, MIL are defined by the framework; PO is spelled out in the Stakeholder Analysis. |
Overall Verdict
Go — all criteria pass.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| Confirm that S01 as both owner and approving reviewer is acceptable | S01 | 2026-10-09 |