Tirsvad
69021844af
S01 accepts the nine SQA review records. The one-person independence limit stays recorded in each record. No issue closed: documentation status only, no code changed.
50 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
50 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# RC-001 Business Case Review
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-001 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-06 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [8ef00aa] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001] (docs/business-case.md)
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] (`QC-BC-001`)
|
|
- Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost-Benefit table is explicitly qualitative and says why (no money involved). |
|
|
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Three risks, each with impact and mitigation. |
|
|
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Five criteria with targets and a measure each. |
|
|
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` are separate. |
|
|
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01 to S03 only; no roles are re-described. |
|
|
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodology section names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and the coding conventions. |
|
|
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Fixed in v2: the first draft had no duration, although MIL-001 to MIL-003 and PP-001 cite one. Constraints now state 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-12. |
|
|
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation is a single "Proceed" with a reason. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — all mandatory criteria pass. Criterion 7 first failed (missing duration constraint) and was fixed in the same change as BC-001 v2.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| Add the duration constraint to BC-001 (done in v2) | S01 | 2026-10-06 |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
|
|
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-business-case.md
|
|
[8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
|