015-coffee-machine/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-009-project-plan-v2.md

RC-009 Project Plan v2 Review

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-009
CrossReference	PP-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-06	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S01	Initial version	52b9725

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: PP-001 (docs/project-plan.md, version 2 as reviewed; version 3 after the actions below)
• Checklist used: none. The framework has no QC checklist for the Project Plan. The criteria below are taken from the required sections and the "Validating" note in the framework's Project Plan reference (PP-reference); they are an ad hoc list, not a QC-* checklist.
• Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The document was written by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Purpose states what is scheduled and over what constraint	Pass	Fixed in v3: it said "three phases" and "short assignment timeline"; it now says four phases and the one-week duration in [BC-001].
2	Planning assumptions give the start date and phase length, consistent with the Business Case duration	Pass	Start 2026-10-05, end 2026-10-12, as in the Business Case duration constraint. Fixed in v3: "one branch and one pull request per phase" did not match what happened.
3	Gateway Schedule has one row per MIL-* document, with its Milestone link once synced	Pass	Four rows for MIL-001 to MIL-004; Milestones 40, 41, 42 and 48 are linked.
4	Timeline diagram has one bar per phase and a marker per Go/No-Go decision	Pass	Four bars and four markers. The diagram was not rendered: no PlantUML server is configured.
5	Scope Coverage maps every Business Case scope item to a gateway	Pass	All six In Scope items of BC-001 v4 map to MIL-001 to MIL-004 or to planning.
6	Dependencies state the gateway order and what a No-Go does to later dates	Pass	Fixed in v3: the chain said MIL-004 follows MIL-003 but the windows overlap. The text now says MIL-004 may start once the MIL-003 tests are merged.
7	Plan risks are specific to the plan and each has a mitigation	Pass	Fixed in v3: the "README template not supplied" risk was resolved and was removed. Two risks remain, each with a mitigation.
8	Open Issues lists only unresolved items	Pass	Fixed in v3: the README template and the Python version reading were resolved (README written; BC-001 v4 states the reading). One open item remains: the optional use case.
9	CrossReference cites the Business Case, the Stakeholder Analysis and every MIL-* document, and the links are defined	Pass	BC-001, SA-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-004 are cited and defined.
10	Windows and decision dates agree with each MIL-* Target Date and the Business Case duration	Pass	Decision dates 2026-10-07, 10-10, 10-12, 10-12 equal the Target Dates; all lie inside 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-12.

Overall Verdict

Go — every criterion passes. Five defects were found in version 2 (wrong phase count, wrong delivery assumption, dependency and window overlap, a resolved risk, resolved open issues) and fixed in the same change as PP-001 v3.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
Correct the phase count and the delivery assumption (done in v3)	S01	2026-10-06
State the MIL-003/MIL-004 overlap in Dependencies (done in v3)	S01	2026-10-06
Remove the resolved risk and open issues (done in v3)	S01	2026-10-06
Ask the framework to add a QC checklist for the Project Plan (upstream)	S01	-

---