Tirsvad
69021844af
S01 accepts the nine SQA review records. The one-person independence limit stays recorded in each record. No issue closed: documentation status only, no code changed.
55 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
# RC-009 Project Plan v2 Review
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-009 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [PP-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-06 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [52b9725] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [PP-001] (docs/project-plan.md, version 2 as reviewed; version 3 after the actions below)
|
|
- Checklist used: none. The framework has no QC checklist for the Project Plan. The criteria below are taken from the required sections and the "Validating" note in the framework's Project Plan reference ([PP-reference]); they are an ad hoc list, not a `QC-*` checklist.
|
|
- Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The document was written by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Purpose states what is scheduled and over what constraint | Pass | Fixed in v3: it said "three phases" and "short assignment timeline"; it now says four phases and the one-week duration in [BC-001]. |
|
|
| 2 | Planning assumptions give the start date and phase length, consistent with the Business Case duration | Pass | Start 2026-10-05, end 2026-10-12, as in the Business Case duration constraint. Fixed in v3: "one branch and one pull request per phase" did not match what happened. |
|
|
| 3 | Gateway Schedule has one row per MIL-* document, with its Milestone link once synced | Pass | Four rows for MIL-001 to MIL-004; Milestones 40, 41, 42 and 48 are linked. |
|
|
| 4 | Timeline diagram has one bar per phase and a marker per Go/No-Go decision | Pass | Four bars and four markers. The diagram was not rendered: no PlantUML server is configured. |
|
|
| 5 | Scope Coverage maps every Business Case scope item to a gateway | Pass | All six In Scope items of BC-001 v4 map to MIL-001 to MIL-004 or to planning. |
|
|
| 6 | Dependencies state the gateway order and what a No-Go does to later dates | Pass | Fixed in v3: the chain said MIL-004 follows MIL-003 but the windows overlap. The text now says MIL-004 may start once the MIL-003 tests are merged. |
|
|
| 7 | Plan risks are specific to the plan and each has a mitigation | Pass | Fixed in v3: the "README template not supplied" risk was resolved and was removed. Two risks remain, each with a mitigation. |
|
|
| 8 | Open Issues lists only unresolved items | Pass | Fixed in v3: the README template and the Python version reading were resolved (README written; BC-001 v4 states the reading). One open item remains: the optional use case. |
|
|
| 9 | CrossReference cites the Business Case, the Stakeholder Analysis and every MIL-* document, and the links are defined | Pass | BC-001, SA-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-004 are cited and defined. |
|
|
| 10 | Windows and decision dates agree with each MIL-* Target Date and the Business Case duration | Pass | Decision dates 2026-10-07, 10-10, 10-12, 10-12 equal the Target Dates; all lie inside 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-12. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — every criterion passes. Five defects were found in version 2 (wrong phase count, wrong delivery assumption, dependency and window overlap, a resolved risk, resolved open issues) and fixed in the same change as PP-001 v3.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| Correct the phase count and the delivery assumption (done in v3) | S01 | 2026-10-06 |
|
|
| State the MIL-003/MIL-004 overlap in Dependencies (done in v3) | S01 | 2026-10-06 |
|
|
| Remove the resolved risk and open issues (done in v3) | S01 | 2026-10-06 |
|
|
| Ask the framework to add a QC checklist for the Project Plan (upstream) | S01 | - |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[PP-001]: ../../project-plan.md
|
|
[PP-reference]: ../../../framework/.agents/skills/artifact/references/PP.md
|
|
[52b9725]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/52b972520d33dc3b50f1c050d874aaeb7293a557
|