Files
015-coffee-machine/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md

2.7 KiB

RC-002 Stakeholder Analysis Review

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-002
CrossReference SA-001, QC-SA-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-06 Proposed Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S01 Initial version 8ef00aa

Artifact Under Review

  • Instance reviewed: SA-001 (docs/stakeholder-analysis.md)
  • Checklist used: QC-SA-001 (QC-SA-001)
  • Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries Pass S01 to S03 each have power, interest and quadrant.
2 Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts Pass IDs S01 to S03 are used by every other document.
3 Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description Pass Levels are stated as High/Low in the table, with organisation and role.
4 Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones Pass Communication table maps each stakeholder to MIL-001 to MIL-003.
5 Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies Pass One conflict (assignment names vs testable structure) with a mitigation.
6 Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives Pass Traceability table maps each stakeholder to [BC-001] objectives.
7 Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) Pass Each concern has a FURPS+ attribute.
8 Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry Pass Plain language, short; each stakeholder can find their own row.

Overall Verdict

Go — all criteria pass. The Sign-Off row said Pending review and was updated to the Go in SA-001 v2.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
Record the sign-off in SA-001 (done in v2) S01 2026-10-06