Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/015-coffee-machine

Fork 0

Files

T

Tirsvad 69021844af

CI / checks (push) Successful in 50s

Details

CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 50s

Details

Sign review records RC-001 to RC-009 as accepted

S01 accepts the nine SQA review records. The one-person independence
limit stays recorded in each record.
No issue closed: documentation status only, no code changed.

2026-10-06 22:05:23 +08:00

2.7 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

RC-001 Business Case Review

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-001
CrossReference	BC-001, QC-BC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-06	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S01	Initial version	8ef00aa

Artifact Under Review

Instance reviewed: BC-001 (docs/business-case.md)
Checklist used: QC-BC-001 (QC-BC-001)
Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified	Pass	Cost-Benefit table is explicitly qualitative and says why (no money involved).
2	Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation	Pass	Three risks, each with impact and mitigation.
3	Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations	Pass	Five criteria with targets and a measure each.
4	Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope	Pass	`### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` are separate.
5	Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline	Pass	Stakeholders table cites S01 to S03 only; no roles are re-described.
6	Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman)	Pass	Methodology section names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and the coding conventions.
7	Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another	Pass	Fixed in v2: the first draft had no duration, although MIL-001 to MIL-003 and PP-001 cite one. Constraints now state 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-12.
8	Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation	Pass	Recommendation is a single "Proceed" with a reason.

Overall Verdict

Go — all mandatory criteria pass. Criterion 7 first failed (missing duration constraint) and was fixed in the same change as BC-001 v2.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
Add the duration constraint to BC-001 (done in v2)	S01	2026-10-06

2.7 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History