Tirsvad
a1ff73580f
Review BC-001, SA-001, PP-001 and MIL-001 and record the results as RC-001 to RC-004. All four verdicts are Go, so their Version History rows become Accepted and the previous rows Deprecated. MIL-002 to MIL-004 stay Proposed. BC-001 failed criterion 1 (cost-benefit not justified as qualitative). Add the justification and a target-completion constraint (2026-10-14) that PP-001 and MIL-001 are checked against. Add the Traceability Matrix (TM-001) and register RC and TM in the artifact registry. PP has no QC checklist, so RC-003 checks the plan against BC-001 and the milestones instead. Author and reviewer are both S01, a deviation noted in each record. Refs #5
48 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# SQA Review Record: Stakeholder Analysis
|
||
|
||
## Metadata
|
||
| Key | Value |
|
||
| --- | --- |
|
||
| ID | RC-002 |
|
||
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |
|
||
|
||
## Version History
|
||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 2026-10-04 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||
|
||
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
|
||
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]
|
||
|
||
## Checklist Results
|
||
|
||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder | Pass | S01–S03 all classified. |
|
||
| 2 | Each stakeholder has a unique, stable ID | Pass | S01, S02, S03. |
|
||
| 3 | Roles and organizational context defined with explicit Power and Interest levels | Pass | Summary table. |
|
||
| 4 | Communication needs mapped to phases or milestones (Optional) | Pass | Communication Requirements table cites MIL-001 to MIL-004. |
|
||
| 5 | Conflicting interests identified with mitigation | Pass | One conflict (tooling versus simple repository), mitigated. |
|
||
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table cites O1–O5. |
|
||
| 7 | Concerns expressed in business language and FURPS+ (Optional) | Pass | FURPS+ mapping table. |
|
||
| 8 | Understandable by non-technical stakeholders (Optional) | Pass | Plain language, short document. |
|
||
|
||
## Overall Verdict
|
||
|
||
Go — all criteria pass. Reviewer and author are both S01: the project has a single participant, so the framework's author/reviewer separation cannot be met. S01 accepted this deviation when requesting acceptance (2026-10-04).
|
||
|
||
## Action Items
|
||
|
||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| None | — | — |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
|
||
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
|