The 13 pages of the existing wiki (Home, Description, Install and AI Prompt Template in English, Danish and Bahasa Malaysia, and _Sidebar) are exported unchanged, with an empty wiki/.publish (no pruning). Pilot of TirSystem/github-action#59.
47 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
47 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
# AI Prompt Template
|
|
|
|
🌐 **English** · [Dansk](AI-Prompt-Template-da) · [Bahasa Melayu](AI-Prompt-Template-ms)
|
|
|
|
Prompts for reviewing with an AI agent. Run the review in a **fresh session**
|
|
if the same agent wrote the document: the reviewer must not be the author.
|
|
|
|
## Review a document
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
Review <path/to/document.md> against the checklist <path/to/qc-type.md>.
|
|
For every numbered criterion give Pass, Fail or N-A with the evidence (quote
|
|
the line of the document). Then list the failed Mandatory criteria first,
|
|
give a verdict (Go, Go-with-conditions, No-Go) and the smallest change that
|
|
would make each failed criterion pass. Do not edit the document.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Review code
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
Review the changes in <path or diff> against <path/to/qc-programming-lang.md>
|
|
and our coding conventions in <path>. Report each criterion as Pass, Fail or
|
|
N-A with file and line. Do not fix anything; list the findings by severity.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Review the language and domain
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
Review <document> against qc-language-domain.md. The Product Owner's language
|
|
is <language> and the domain is <domain>. Check that every PO term used in the
|
|
document appears in the dictionary <path> and that no IT term leaks into a
|
|
PO-facing section. List each mismatch with the line.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Re-review after fixes
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
Re-review only the criteria that failed in <previous review record>. For each,
|
|
state whether the new <document> now passes and quote the evidence.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Tips
|
|
|
|
- Give the agent **one** checklist per review.
|
|
- Ask for evidence per criterion; a bare "Pass" is not a review.
|
|
- Treat the agent's verdict as input. The reviewer decides.
|