53 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
# Review Record: UC-002
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-022 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [UC-002], [QC-UC-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-10 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [a2bf2d4] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [UC-002]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-UC-001] (Brief format)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario | Pass | Finding fixed during this review: the paragraph also described the failure alternatives; it now summarizes only the main success scenario (the alternatives are in US-001.03). |
|
|
| 2 | Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure | N-A | Format is Brief. |
|
|
| 3 | All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows | N-A | Format is Brief; the sections of a Brief use case are present (actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions, paragraph). |
|
|
| 4 | Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined | Pass | Both stated. |
|
|
| 5 | Primary actor is explicitly stated | Pass | DevOps Professional. |
|
|
| 6 | Stakeholders and their interests are stated | Pass | S-IDs from SA-001 with an interest each. |
|
|
| 7 | Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps | N-A | Format is Brief: one paragraph. |
|
|
| 8 | Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 | N-A | No alternative flows in a Brief use case; the relationships are in UCD-001. |
|
|
| 9 | Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text | N-A | No steps in a Brief use case. |
|
|
| 10 | Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories | Pass | Title and actor match UCD-001 and US-001 exactly. |
|
|
| 11 | Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated | Pass | Scope and user-goal level stated. |
|
|
| 12 | Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail | Pass | Goal wording; the guides and secrets are named, no UI. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go - all applicable criteria pass; the one finding (criterion 1) was fixed during the review. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| None | - | - |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[UC-002]: ../../uc-002/uc.md
|
|
[QC-UC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-use-case.md
|
|
[a2bf2d4]: https://git.tirsystem.com/TirSystem/github-action/commit/a2bf2d420416f7aff2badc6fe32a7690e2e523fd
|