Tirsvad
e35b1c5674
Adds MIL-013 (accepted, RC-083), objective O7 to the Business Case (RC-084), the schedule row, risk and dependency to the Project Plan, and the traceability rows. No code is added by this commit.
5.8 KiB
5.8 KiB
Review Record: MIL-013 and PP-001 (MIL-013)
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-083 |
| CrossReference | MIL-013, PP-001, BC-001, QC-MIL-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version; accepted by the author in chat as stand-in for S01, after one correction found in the first read | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-013; delta of PP-001 for the added milestone
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 for the milestone; for the plan, the criteria of
PP.md(no QC checklist exists for PP-001) - Scope: full review of MIL-013; delta re-review of PP-001, earlier record RC-080
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
- Mode: supervised, not independent (the author, Jens Tirsvad Nielsen, asked in chat on 2026-10-19 for the acceptance and stands in for S01; the AI prepared the evidence)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | ## Deliverable names release 2.3.0 with the reusable workflow, its scripts under tools/, guide, README section, wiki pages in three languages, changelog entry, offline tests, an ADR for the detection method and a review record, and the two pull requests in the other repositories. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Eleven criteria, each with a checkable Go and No-Go. The first is measurable (a corpus of named size, recall of at least 90 % for Danish and Malay, at most one false positive per 200 English comments); the others are runs, searches or a verified setting. Criterion 7 (the merge is blocked) depends on a setting that only the repository owner makes, and says so. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | MIL-010 (the comment scanner), MIL-004 (the Release workflow), MIL-011 (MAJOR_TAG), ADR-0005; the outside dependencies (a Gitea token from S03, branch protection by S01 or S03, the framework and checklist repositories) are named. The first read noted that the planned window of MIL-004 (2026-11-16 to 2026-11-28) starts after this milestone does; MIL-004 is already released (v1, v2), so the dependency is met and the plan says nothing wrong. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Objective O7 and success criterion 7 of BC-001, added in the same change and reviewed in RC-084. The first read found the traceability row still saying O7 was "added at acceptance of this milestone", which is now false; it states the objective plainly. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner S05, approving reviewer S01; both are in SA-001. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | 2026-11-20, confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-19; the Business Case sets no deadline. The window (2026-11-09 to 2026-11-20) follows MIL-012 (2026-11-06) and overlaps MIL-009, which is wiki callers and does not use the check's token or reviewer. |
Plan delta (PP-001)
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Every milestone has a MIL-* document and the plan's dates equal that document's target date |
Pass | MIL-001 to MIL-013 exist; the MIL-013 decision date (2026-11-20) equals its Target Date. |
| 2 | Every Business Case scope item is covered by a gateway | Pass | The new scope item "A shared workflow that checks that comments in source code are in English and tells the author" is covered by MIL-013 in the scope table. |
| 3 | The schedule respects the Business Case constraints | Pass | No deadline in the Business Case; the window is two weeks. |
| 4 | Dependencies between milestones are stated | Pass | MIL-004 + MIL-010 + MIL-011 -> MIL-013. |
| 5 | Every gateway has an owner who is a stakeholder ID | Pass | S05. |
| 6 | Plan content is internally consistent | Pass | The Purpose says "thirteen"; the Gantt, the schedule, the scope table, the dependencies and the planning assumption agree. Unused commit link definitions left by the history roll were removed. |
| 7 | Open Issues are current | Pass | A plan risk is added: the check calls a correct comment non-English or misses a Danish or Malay one, with the mitigation in tasks 1 and 2 and the exception marker. |
Overall Verdict
Go - all criteria pass after one correction found in the first read (the stale "added at acceptance" wording). The author confirmed the acceptance in chat on 2026-10-19 as stand-in for S01; this is not an independent review.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| Confirm this record by S01 when an independent reading is possible | S01 | 2026-11-02 |
| Task 9: decide which repositories mark the check as required and set it; the workflow cannot, and the AI does not change branch protection | S01 | Before task 8 ends |
| Ask the operator for a Gitea token that may comment on pull requests, stored as an organization secret, before task 8 | S03 | 2026-11-13 |