Tirsvad
c5d5941869
Adds MIL-012 (accepted, RC-080), objective O6 to the Business Case (RC-081), the schedule row, risk and dependency to the Project Plan, and the traceability rows. The action code on this branch is not part of this commit.
3.6 KiB
3.6 KiB
Review Record: BC-001 (objective O6, VPN actions for deployment)
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-081 |
| CrossReference | BC-001, QC-BC-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version; accepted by the author in chat as stand-in for S01 | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: BC-001
- Checklist used: QC-BC-001
- Scope: delta re-review of criteria 2, 3, 4 and 7 (the change adds objective O6, an In Scope bullet, an assumption, a constraint and success criterion 6); criteria 1, 5, 6 and 8 are re-read and unchanged. Earlier record: RC-067
- Language and domain: n/a for this delta (the action item of RC-067 about the Language and Domain rows is still open)
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: supervised, not independent (the author, Jens Tirsvad Nielsen, asked in chat on 2026-10-19 for the acceptance and stands in for S01; the AI prepared the evidence)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Unchanged; the Cost-Benefit Assessment labels its qualitative form. |
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | The delivery risk of the VPN actions (the runner cannot give the privileges, or the daemon does not survive between steps) is a plan risk in PP-001 with a mitigation; the Business Case risks about secrets already cover a leaked key. |
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Criterion 6: "2 (WireGuard and Tailscale) by MIL-012", measured by the recorded runs of tasks 3 to 5, with no secret in the run log. |
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | "Shared composite actions that connect a deployment job to a private network through WireGuard or Tailscale (MIL-012)" is a new In Scope bullet. Out of Scope is unchanged and consistent: operating runners stays out, and the new assumption says S03 provides the privileged runner. |
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Unchanged; the new assumption names S03. |
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Unchanged. |
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | The assumption (S03 provides a runner with NET_ADMIN and /dev/net/tun) and the constraint (a VPN key or token never appears in a log, an artifact or a command line) are in their own sections. |
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Unchanged: Proceed. |
Overall Verdict
Go - all eight criteria pass for the revision that adds objective O6, its scope item, assumption, constraint and success criterion 6. The author confirmed the acceptance in chat on 2026-10-19 as stand-in for S01; there is no independent reader and the decision stays open to challenge.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
The Metadata table of BC-001 has no Language and Domain rows (QC-LANG-001 criterion 1); this predates this change and is carried over from RC-067. Add the rows or record in an ADR why they are not needed |
S01 | Before the next material change to BC-001 |