github-action/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-056-uc-005-cpp-csharp.md

Review Record: UC-005 (C++ and C#)

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-056
CrossReference	UC-005, QC-UC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-11	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S01	Initial version	1bc56f8

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: UC-005 after the extension of its Brief to C++ and C# (MIL-007 task 1)
• Checklist used: QC-UC-001 (Brief format)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario	Pass	Finding fixed during this review: the extension had added a sentence about a language that needs a build or a project file and says what is missing, which is a failure flow. It is removed from the Brief; the stories US-001.16 and .17 carry it as an acceptance criterion.
2	Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure	N-A	Format is Brief.
3	All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows	N-A	Format is Brief; actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions and the paragraph are present.
4	Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined	Pass	The precondition now lists the four languages (Python, shell, C++, C#); the postcondition is unchanged.
5	Primary actor is explicitly stated	Pass	Software Engineer.
6	Stakeholders and their interests are stated	Pass	S02 and S05, unchanged.
7	Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps	N-A	Format is Brief.
8	Alternative/exception flows correctly reference <<include>>/<<extend>> use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1	N-A	None in a Brief.
9	Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text	N-A	No steps in a Brief.
10	Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories	Pass	Title and actor equal UCD-001; the Stories line lists US-001.09, .10, .16 and .17, which exist.
11	Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated	Pass	Scope and user-goal level, unchanged.
12	Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail	Pass	Goal wording; the tool names are not in the Brief for C++ and C#.

Overall Verdict

Go - all applicable criteria pass; the one finding (criterion 1) was fixed during the review. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-11, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
Update the description of this use case in the Use Case Diagram table of UCD-001 ("Lint, format and type checks run on every change ...") to cover C++ and C# at its next review	S01	next review of UCD-001

---