Tirsvad
a5bb159e2c
TirSystem/github-action: Publish wiki / publish-wiki (push) Skipped
TirSystem/github-action: Sync GitHub mirror metadata / sync-metadata (push) Skipped
Validate workflows / validate (pull_request) Successful in 17s
53 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# Review Record: UC-005 (C++ and C#)
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-056 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [UC-005], [QC-UC-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-11 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [1bc56f8] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [UC-005] after the extension of its Brief to C++ and C# (MIL-007 task 1)
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-UC-001] (Brief format)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario | Pass | Finding fixed during this review: the extension had added a sentence about a language that needs a build or a project file and says what is missing, which is a failure flow. It is removed from the Brief; the stories US-001.16 and .17 carry it as an acceptance criterion. |
|
|
| 2 | Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure | N-A | Format is Brief. |
|
|
| 3 | All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows | N-A | Format is Brief; actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions and the paragraph are present. |
|
|
| 4 | Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined | Pass | The precondition now lists the four languages (Python, shell, C++, C#); the postcondition is unchanged. |
|
|
| 5 | Primary actor is explicitly stated | Pass | Software Engineer. |
|
|
| 6 | Stakeholders and their interests are stated | Pass | S02 and S05, unchanged. |
|
|
| 7 | Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps | N-A | Format is Brief. |
|
|
| 8 | Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 | N-A | None in a Brief. |
|
|
| 9 | Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text | N-A | No steps in a Brief. |
|
|
| 10 | Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories | Pass | Title and actor equal UCD-001; the Stories line lists US-001.09, .10, .16 and .17, which exist. |
|
|
| 11 | Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated | Pass | Scope and user-goal level, unchanged. |
|
|
| 12 | Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail | Pass | Goal wording; the tool names are not in the Brief for C++ and C#. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go - all applicable criteria pass; the one finding (criterion 1) was fixed during the review. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-11, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| Update the description of this use case in the Use Case Diagram table of UCD-001 ("Lint, format and type checks run on every change ...") to cover C++ and C# at its next review | S01 | next review of UCD-001 |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[UC-005]: ../../uc-005/uc.md
|
|
[QC-UC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-use-case.md
|
|
[1bc56f8]: https://git.tirsystem.com/TirSystem/github-action/commit/1bc56f8b771531f221f218fc00b147ecc73c051e
|