github-action/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-067-bc-001-o5.md

Review Record: BC-001 (objective O5, code metrics and coverage badges)

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-067
CrossReference	BC-001, QC-BC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-14	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version; accepted	5002450

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: BC-001
• Checklist used: QC-BC-001
• Scope: delta re-review of criteria 3, 4 and 7 (the change adds objective O5, an In Scope bullet and success criterion 5); criteria 1, 2, 5, 6 and 8 are re-read and unchanged. Earlier record: RC-008
• Language and domain: n/a for this delta (see the action item about the Language and Domain rows)
• Language reviewer: none
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01; the user accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-14)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified	Pass	Unchanged; the Cost-Benefit Assessment labels its qualitative form.
2	Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation	Pass	Unchanged. The delivery risk of the badges is a plan risk in PP-001, with a mitigation.
3	Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations	Pass	Criterion 5: "At least 1 besides this one by MIL-010", measured in the README of the consuming repository.
4	Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope	Pass	"A shared workflow for code metrics and coverage badges (MIL-010)" is a new In Scope bullet; Out of Scope is unchanged and does not contradict it ("application code of consuming repositories" is not read or changed by the counter).
5	Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline	Pass	Unchanged; the stakeholders table uses S-IDs.
6	Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman)	Pass	Unchanged.
7	Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another	Pass	Unchanged. The constraint "tools available on the runner" still holds: the counter uses the Python standard library.
8	Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation	Pass	Unchanged: Proceed.

Overall Verdict

Go - all eight criteria pass for the revision that adds objective O5, its scope item and success criterion 5. The user accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-14; the AI records the acceptance as stand-in for S01. There is no independent reader and the decision stays open to challenge in the run summary.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
The Metadata table of BC-001 has no Language and Domain rows (QC-LANG-001 criterion 1); this predates this change, and no earlier record applies QC-LANG-001 to it. Add the rows or record in an ADR why they are not needed	S01	Before the next material change to BC-001

---