github-action/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-081-bc-001-o6.md

Review Record: BC-001 (objective O6, VPN actions for deployment)

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-081
CrossReference	BC-001, QC-BC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-19	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S01	Initial version; accepted by the author in chat as stand-in for S01	c5d5941

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: BC-001
• Checklist used: QC-BC-001
• Scope: delta re-review of criteria 2, 3, 4 and 7 (the change adds objective O6, an In Scope bullet, an assumption, a constraint and success criterion 6); criteria 1, 5, 6 and 8 are re-read and unchanged. Earlier record: RC-067
• Language and domain: n/a for this delta (the action item of RC-067 about the Language and Domain rows is still open)
• Language reviewer: none
• Mode: supervised, not independent (the author, Jens Tirsvad Nielsen, asked in chat on 2026-10-19 for the acceptance and stands in for S01; the AI prepared the evidence)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified	Pass	Unchanged; the Cost-Benefit Assessment labels its qualitative form.
2	Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation	Pass	The delivery risk of the VPN actions (the runner cannot give the privileges, or the daemon does not survive between steps) is a plan risk in PP-001 with a mitigation; the Business Case risks about secrets already cover a leaked key.
3	Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations	Pass	Criterion 6: "2 (WireGuard and Tailscale) by MIL-012", measured by the recorded runs of tasks 3 to 5, with no secret in the run log.
4	Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope	Pass	"Shared composite actions that connect a deployment job to a private network through WireGuard or Tailscale (MIL-012)" is a new In Scope bullet. Out of Scope is unchanged and consistent: operating runners stays out, and the new assumption says S03 provides the privileged runner.
5	Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline	Pass	Unchanged; the new assumption names S03.
6	Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman)	Pass	Unchanged.
7	Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another	Pass	The assumption (S03 provides a runner with NET_ADMIN and /dev/net/tun) and the constraint (a VPN key or token never appears in a log, an artifact or a command line) are in their own sections.
8	Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation	Pass	Unchanged: Proceed.

Overall Verdict

Go - all eight criteria pass for the revision that adds objective O6, its scope item, assumption, constraint and success criterion 6. The author confirmed the acceptance in chat on 2026-10-19 as stand-in for S01; there is no independent reader and the decision stays open to challenge.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
The Metadata table of BC-001 has no Language and Domain rows (QC-LANG-001 criterion 1); this predates this change and is carried over from RC-067. Add the rows or record in an ADR why they are not needed	S01	Before the next material change to BC-001

---