Files

T

Tirsvad 4cf52afe00 Add the upgrade guide and the use case Consume a Workflow Update

UC-007, US-001.14 and US-001.15, the upgrade guide on the wiki in three
languages, and RC-044 to RC-046 with the traceability matrix.

Task: MIL-004#3

2026-10-10 22:55:40 +08:00

2.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

Review Record: UC-007

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-044
CrossReference	UC-007, QC-UC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-10	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S01	Initial version	pending

Artifact Under Review

Instance reviewed: UC-007
Checklist used: QC-UC-001 (Brief format)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario	Pass	The paragraph describes read, try in one repository, read the run, roll out; the rollback and the failures are in the stories and the guide.
2	Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure	N-A	Format is Brief.
3	All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows	N-A	Format is Brief; actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions and the paragraph are present.
4	Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined	Pass	Both stated; the precondition names the release process of UC-006.
5	Primary actor is explicitly stated	Pass	Software Engineer.
6	Stakeholders and their interests are stated	Pass	S02 and S05.
7	Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps	N-A	Format is Brief.
8	Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1	N-A	No alternative flows in a Brief use case.
9	Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text	N-A	No steps in a Brief use case.
10	Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories	Pass	Title and actor match UCD-001 (checked mechanically); stories are US-001.13 to US-001.15.
11	Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated	Pass	Scope and user-goal level.
12	Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail	Pass	Goal wording; no tool named.

Overall Verdict

Go - all applicable criteria pass. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

2.6 KiB Raw Blame History