# Review Record: UC-007

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-044 |
| CrossReference | [UC-007], [QC-UC-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-10 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [UC-007]
- Checklist used: [QC-UC-001] (Brief format)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario | Pass | The paragraph describes read, try in one repository, read the run, roll out; the rollback and the failures are in the stories and the guide. |
| 2 | Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure | N-A | Format is Brief. |
| 3 | All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows | N-A | Format is Brief; actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions and the paragraph are present. |
| 4 | Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined | Pass | Both stated; the precondition names the release process of UC-006. |
| 5 | Primary actor is explicitly stated | Pass | Software Engineer. |
| 6 | Stakeholders and their interests are stated | Pass | S02 and S05. |
| 7 | Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps | N-A | Format is Brief. |
| 8 | Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 | N-A | No alternative flows in a Brief use case. |
| 9 | Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text | N-A | No steps in a Brief use case. |
| 10 | Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories | Pass | Title and actor match UCD-001 (checked mechanically); stories are US-001.13 to US-001.15. |
| 11 | Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated | Pass | Scope and user-goal level. |
| 12 | Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail | Pass | Goal wording; no tool named. |

## Overall Verdict

Go - all applicable criteria pass. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | - | - |

---

[UC-007]: ../../uc-007/uc.md
[QC-UC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-use-case.md