Files

T

Tirsvad 385d2fb7cb Define and accept the contract of the shared quality-check workflow

Add the brief use case UC-005 (Run Project Quality Checks), the actor and
use case in UCD-001, stories US-001.09 and US-001.10, and ADR-0005 with the
inputs, the pinned tools and what a pass and a fail mean, based on a probe
of the runner image. Review and accept them (RC-035 to RC-038) and update
TM-001 and the registry.

Task: MIL-003#2

2026-10-10 16:06:30 +08:00

1.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

Review Record: US-001 (quality checks)

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-036
CrossReference	US-001, QC-US-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-10	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S01	Initial version	pending

Artifact Under Review

Instance reviewed: US-001
Checklist used: QC-US-001

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Follows INVEST criteria (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable)	Pass	INVEST check updated to ten stories; the two new ones are independent of the others.
2	Written in "As a / I want / So that" form	Pass	US-001.09 and US-001.10.
3	Clear, testable acceptance criteria are included	Pass	Two Given/When/Then criteria each, matching the ADR-0005 contract.
4	Traceable to a use case or epic	Pass	UC-005 and MIL-003.
5	Story is sized to fit within a single iteration	Pass	One goal each.
6	Story statement avoids technical implementation detail	Pass	No tool named in the statements.
7	Role named in the story matches an actor defined in the Use Case Diagram	Pass	Software Engineer is in UCD-001.

Overall Verdict

Go - all seven criteria pass for the two added stories. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

1.6 KiB Raw Blame History