Files
github-action/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-004-stakeholder-analysis.md
T

3.0 KiB

Review Record: SA-001 Stakeholder Analysis

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-004
CrossReference SA-001, QC-SA-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-10 Deprecated Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S05 Initial version aa3f088
2026-10-10 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S05 S01 stood in for S05
Independence of the review is still open
pending

Artifact Under Review

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries Pass S01 to S05 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant.
2 Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts Pass IDs S01 to S05 are used by BC-001, PP-001 and the milestones.
3 Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description Pass Role, organization and HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW levels per stakeholder, with a rationale section.
4 Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones Pass Communication Requirements table maps each stakeholder to a milestone.
5 Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies Pass Four conflicts, each with stakeholders and a mitigation.
6 Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives Pass Business Goal Alignment maps each concern to O1 to O4 of BC-001.
7 Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) Pass Primary Concern column plus a FURPS+ mapping table.
8 Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry Pass Plain-language summary table and one section per topic.

Overall Verdict

Go — all eight criteria pass, with two follow-ups that do not affect the criteria. Retrospective review prepared 2026-10-10 at the request of S01; the instance has been Accepted since 2026-10-03 and this record confirms it against the checklist. The author and the approving reviewer are the same person (S01); the S05 stand-in review is recorded in RC-001 and applies here too; independence is still open.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
Update the Sign-Off section, which still says 'Pending review by S01 and S05', with a Version History row S01 2026-10-17
Identify the holders of the S03 role (listed as 'holders to be confirmed') S01 2026-10-17