2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
Review Record: PP-001 Project Plan (P1 use cases)
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-025 |
| CrossReference | PP-001, BC-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-10 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | a2bf2d4 |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: PP-001
- Checklist used: none: the Project Plan has no QC checklist. Validated against the Business Case BC-001 and the Go / No-Go criteria of each listed milestone, as
PP.mdprescribes.
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Every milestone in the plan has a MIL-* document and the plan's dates equal that document's target date |
Pass | Unchanged. |
| 2 | Every Business Case scope item is covered by a gateway | Pass | Unchanged. |
| 3 | The schedule respects the Business Case constraints | Pass | Unchanged. |
| 4 | Dependencies between milestones are stated | Pass | Unchanged. |
| 5 | Every gateway has an owner who is a stakeholder ID | Pass | Unchanged. |
| 6 | Plan content is internally consistent | Pass | The appendix's use case candidates 1 to 4 correspond to UC-001 to UC-004; the plan cites US-001. |
| 7 | Open Issues are current | Pass | Finding fixed during this review: the item about use cases said the documents "need review". It now states that the P1 candidates are written as UC-001 to UC-004 with UCD-001 and US-001, and that P2 and P3 have none. |
Overall Verdict
Go - all seven criteria pass; the one finding was fixed during the review. S01 gave the Go in chat on 2026-10-10, standing in for the other reviewers as ADR-0002 records; there is no independent reader.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | - | - |