Files
git-workflows/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-085-mil-013-results.md
Tirsvad b8d5bae3ae
TirSystem/github-action: Sync GitHub mirror metadata / sync-metadata (push) Skipped
Validate workflows / validate (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
Resolve pending commit links for the MIL-013 results
2026-10-21 11:00:16 +08:00

5.3 KiB

Review Record: MIL-013 results of tasks 1 to 8, 10 and 13 (MIL-013)

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-085
CrossReference MIL-013, QC-MIL-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-21 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S01 Initial version; accepted by the author in chat as stand-in for S01 88f852a

Artifact Under Review

  • Instance reviewed: MIL-013
  • Checklist used: QC-MIL-001
  • Scope: delta re-review of the milestone after RC-083: the new ## Verification results section (the results of the merged work, the trial on the instance and its three defects, the search of the logs), and the added [ADR-0012] in the CrossReference. Criteria 1 to 6 are re-read; none of the milestone's own text for them changed. ADR-0012 is not reviewed here: it stays Proposed and needs a review against its own checklist
  • Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
  • Mode: supervised, not independent (the author, Jens Tirsvad Nielsen, asked in chat on 2026-10-21 for the acceptance and stands in for S01; the AI prepared the evidence)

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate Pass Unchanged: release 2.3.0 with the workflow, scripts, guide, wiki, tests, ADR and the two pull requests in the other repositories. The results do not claim any of it is released.
2 Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate Pass Unchanged, eleven criteria. The results bear on criterion 1 (corpus rates, met on the corpus, with the limits of an AI-written corpus said), 3 (a pull request with a Danish comment fails, one without passes: met in runs 440 and 445), 4 (an exception can be marked: met, the marked line was not reported), 5 (one comment that mentions the author, updated, resolved: met when the fix branch is called) and 6 (no token in a log: met for the four jobs searched; the detector made no network call). Criteria 7 to 11 are not claimed.
3 Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped Pass Unchanged; ADR-0012 is added to the CrossReference and exists.
4 Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI Pass Unchanged: objective O7 and success criterion 7 of BC-001 (RC-084).
5 Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified Pass Unchanged: owner S05, approving reviewer S01.
6 Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints Pass Unchanged: 2026-11-20. Open tasks 9, 11, 12 and 14 and the merge of pull request 212 are before it; task 9 needs the owner.

Results check

# Claim in the results Status Evidence/Notes
1 The first call at @main found only the Malay comment and skipped the author step Pass Read from the log of job 2761 of run 433 (id 2478): one finding at trial/sample.py:9, and the step list shows "Tell the author" skipped.
2 In a called workflow gitea.event_name is workflow_call Pass Printed by the debug workflow in runs 435 and 437: event_name=workflow_call number=213 author=Tirsvad base_ref=main; the steps with the event-name conditions are listed as skipped, the others as success.
3 The fix branch finds both comments, writes one comment, updates it, resolves it Pass Runs 440, 443 and 445 read from the API: the comment list of pull request 213 held one comment (id 8715) after each run; its text after run 445 was the "passes" text without a mention.
4 The run link equals the run's address Pass The link in the comment after run 447 is https://git.tirsystem.com/TirSystem/github-action/actions/runs/2492, the html_url of run 447.
5 No credential in the logs Pass A search of four job logs; the only lines matching were REPORT_TOKEN: ***. The search patterns cannot find a short or oddly formed secret, which the result says by naming the patterns.
6 The open items are listed honestly Pass The result names what the trial did not show: a corrected call at @main, a fork pull request, a custom token, the required check, and the call by this repository.

Overall Verdict

Go - the results recorded are accurate and claim no more than the evidence shows. The author confirmed the acceptance in chat on 2026-10-21 as stand-in for S01; this is not an independent review.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
Review ADR-0012 against its checklist and accept or change it; it is Proposed S01 Before task 11 (release 2.3.0)
Review and merge pull request 212 (the three defects); call the corrected workflow at @main once more S01 2026-11-06
Task 9: decide which repositories mark the check as required and set it S01 2026-11-13
Confirm this record by S01 when an independent reading is possible S01 2026-11-09