Files

T

TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5 02875aee5f Accept planning baseline and UC-001 artifacts

Add the Use Case Diagram, Domain Model (use case and project), Dictionary,
Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, review records RC-001 to RC-015 and
the Traceability Matrix. Split US-001 into one story per milestone, make
GitHub optional (AGPL license applied when chosen), and accept BC-001,
SA-001, PP-001, UCD-001, US-001, UC-001, SSD-001, DM-001, DM-002, OC-001,
SD-001, DICT-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 after review.

Refs: no issues synced yet (sync-project.sh dry run only)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-10-05 13:41:36 +08:00

3.4 KiB

Raw Blame History

Stakeholder Analysis

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	SA-001
CrossReference	BC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-05	Deprecated	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S02	Initial version	424f14f
2026-10-05	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S02	Mitigation points to the UC-001 business rules S03 traced to BC objective 7 Sign-off recorded	pending

Purpose

Identify who is affected by RepoFoundry and what each needs from it, so owners and reviewers in later artifacts can cite stable IDs. Method: power/interest grid.

Stakeholder Summary Table

ID	Name	Role/Title	Organization	Power Level	Interest Level	Quadrant	Primary Concern (Business Language)
S01	Tirsvad	Product Owner and maintainer	Not stated	HIGH	HIGH	Manage Closely	New projects start from one repeatable, correct setup
S02	Michael Kragh	DevOps, cybersecurity and maintainer	Not stated	HIGH	HIGH	Manage Closely	Credentials are never exposed and the git host integration is safe
S03	GitHub readers	Readers of the published project	Not stated	LOW	MEDIUM	Keep Informed	Clear documentation they can follow and reuse

Power/Interest Classification Rationale

Manage Closely (S01, S02): the two maintainers decide scope, accept the result and own the code. For now one person holds both roles, so one person both authors and reviews; this should be revisited when a second person takes S02.
Keep Informed (S03): readers cannot change the project but depend on its README being accurate.

Primary Concerns and FURPS+ Mapping

ID	Concern	FURPS+ attribute
S01	One command creates both repositories, the mirror and the project	Functionality
S02	No token in output, URLs or files; no silent overwrite	Functionality (security)
S02	A failed step leaves a clear record of what exists	Reliability
S03	Installation, configuration and usage are documented in clear English	Usability

Communication Requirements

ID	Channel	Frequency	Deliverable	Phase / Milestone
S01	Pull request review	Per phase	Accepted milestone document	MIL-001, MIL-002, MIL-003
S02	Pull request review	Per phase	Security review of the changes	MIL-002, MIL-003
S03	README on GitHub	At release	README.md	MIL-003

Conflicting Interests and Mitigations

Conflict	Stakeholders	Mitigation
Convenience of one-step setup against strict consent prompts for every overwrite	S01, S02	Prompt only where something would be replaced, as set out in the business rules of UC-001; steps that only create new items run without asking

Traceability Analysis

Business Goal Alignment

Stakeholder	Concern	Business Case objective
S01	One-command setup	BC-001 objectives 1–5
S02	Credential safety, no overwrite	BC-001 objective 6
S03	Reusable documentation	BC-001 objective 7

Sign-Off

Reviewed in RC-013 on 2026-10-05: Go.

3.4 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape