TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5
02875aee5f
Add the Use Case Diagram, Domain Model (use case and project), Dictionary, Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, review records RC-001 to RC-015 and the Traceability Matrix. Split US-001 into one story per milestone, make GitHub optional (AGPL license applied when chosen), and accept BC-001, SA-001, PP-001, UCD-001, US-001, UC-001, SSD-001, DM-001, DM-002, OC-001, SD-001, DICT-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 after review. Refs: no issues synced yet (sync-project.sh dry run only) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
49 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
# SQA Review Record: SA-001
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-013 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-05 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S02 | Initial version | pending |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]
|
|
- Review date: 2026-10-05
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 all have Power, Interest and a quadrant. |
|
|
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03, unique and used by the other artifacts. |
|
|
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Roles and levels are explicit. The organization is recorded as Not stated: the Product Owner gave no organization and none was invented. |
|
|
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Channel, frequency and deliverable for each stakeholder, tied to MIL-001 to MIL-003. |
|
|
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | One conflict (convenience against consent prompts) with a mitigation. The mitigation was corrected during this review to point at the UC-001 business rules instead of an undefined option. |
|
|
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Every stakeholder traces to a Business Case objective. S03 had no objective; fixed during this review by adding objective 7 (documentation) to BC-001. |
|
|
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern has a business statement and a FURPS+ attribute. |
|
|
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short tables in plain language. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — All mandatory criteria pass after the two fixes noted. Author and reviewer are the same person for now (S01 and S02 are both held by the Maintainer), so the framework independence rule is not met; re-review when a second person takes S02.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| None | - | - |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
|
|
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
|