Files

T

TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5 02875aee5f Accept planning baseline and UC-001 artifacts

Add the Use Case Diagram, Domain Model (use case and project), Dictionary,
Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, review records RC-001 to RC-015 and
the Traceability Matrix. Split US-001 into one story per milestone, make
GitHub optional (AGPL license applied when chosen), and accept BC-001,
SA-001, PP-001, UCD-001, US-001, UC-001, SSD-001, DM-001, DM-002, OC-001,
SD-001, DICT-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 after review.

Refs: no issues synced yet (sync-project.sh dry run only)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-10-05 13:41:36 +08:00

1.8 KiB

Raw Blame History

SQA Review Record: MIL-001

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-011
CrossReference	MIL-001, QC-MIL-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-05	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S02	Initial version	pending

Artifact Under Review

Instance reviewed: MIL-001
Checklist used: QC-MIL-001
Review date: 2026-10-05

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate	Pass	The script skeleton with safe parsing, prompts, example files and a test harness.
2	Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate	Pass	Six criteria, each with an objective Go and No-Go (including all acceptance criteria of US-001.01).
3	Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped	Pass	None; it is the first phase.
4	Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI	Pass	Maps to Business Case objective 6, success criteria 1 and 6, and US-001.01.
5	Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified	Pass	Owner S01, approving reviewer S02.
6	Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints	Pass	2026-10-16, matches PP-001. The Business Case sets no duration, so nothing conflicts; the date is accepted together with the plan.

Overall Verdict

Go — All mandatory criteria pass. Author and reviewer are the same person for now (S01 and S02 are both held by the Maintainer), so the framework independence rule is not met; re-review when a second person takes S02.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

1.8 KiB Raw Blame History