Files

T

Tirsvad 0b0a3b419a Record S02's acceptance of RC-022 to RC-030

- Review records RC-022 to RC-030 are Accepted
- The documents they review are set to Accepted (previous rows Deprecated)
- RC-028 and RC-029: Go-with-conditions becomes Go; the two action items are closed
- OC-001, SD-001 and DCD-001 carry a note that the UC-002 documents supersede the startProjectCreation signature

2026-10-07 16:38:36 +08:00

4.0 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

SQA Review Record: UC-002 Start the script as a global command

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-023
CrossReference	UC-002, QC-UC-001, UC-001, UCD-001, US-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-07	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	S02	Initial version	1cd27f7

Artifact Under Review

Instance reviewed: UC-002, and the changes it causes in UC-001 and UCD-001.
Checklist used: QC-UC-001 (Fully Dressed).
Review date: 2026-10-07

Checklist Results (QC-UC-001)

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario	N-A	Format is Fully Dressed.
2	Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure	N-A	Format is Fully Dressed.
3	All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows	Pass	Actor, stakeholders, preconditions, postconditions, main scenario, extensions, rules and open issues are present.
4	Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined	Pass	Preconditions name the checkout, the config files and a writable `PATH` folder; postconditions name the link, the working folder and that nothing else was written.
5	Primary actor is explicitly stated	Pass	Primary actor: Maintainer, as in UCD-001.
6	Stakeholders and their interests are stated	Pass	S01, S02 and S03 with their interests.
7	Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps	Pass	Six numbered steps; steps 1 and 2 are the Maintainer's, 3 to 6 the system's.
8	Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1	Pass	Step 5 `<<include>>` UC-001, and UCD-001 shows the same relationship.
9	Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text	Pass	Five rules, each tied to a step.
10	Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories	Pass	Title "Start the script as a global command" and actor equal those of UCD-001 and US-002.
11	Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated	Pass	Level user-goal and scope are stated.
12	Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail	Pass	Written as the Maintainer's goal. It names `PATH`, `--config` and `--env`, which are the Maintainer's own vocabulary for this system, as in UC-001; the rule that named a missing tool was reworded to "on every supported platform" during this review.

Change checks on the other artifacts

Artifact	Change	Status	Evidence/Notes
UC-001	Step 6 and rule 6 (public-only AGPL-3.0 default); step 9 and extension 9e (the framework's own submodules)	Pass	Extension 9e stops the step and names the command to run by hand, without a credential; consistent with US-001.07 and MIL-007.
UCD-001	UC-002 added with `<<include>>` UC-001	Pass	Diagram, actor table, use case table and relationship table agree.

Overall Verdict

Go — UC-002 meets every mandatory criterion. Drafted by Claude Code for S02 against the checklist; the author and reviewer are the same person for now (as in the earlier records). S02 confirmed the verdict on 2026-10-07 and the Version History rows of the reviewed documents were set to Accepted.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	-	-

4.0 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History