Files
014-higher_lower/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-009-uc-001.md
T

2.7 KiB

SQA Review Record: UC-001 Use Case

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-009
CrossReference UC-001, QC-UC-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-04 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S01 Initial version c7164fe

Artifact Under Review

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario N-A Applies to the Brief format only; this use case is Fully Dressed.
2 Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure N-A Applies to the Casual format only; this use case is Fully Dressed.
3 All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows Pass Scope, level, actor, stakeholders, pre/postconditions, scenario, extensions, rules and open issues present.
4 Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined Pass Both defined.
5 Primary actor is explicitly stated Pass Player.
6 Stakeholders and their interests are stated Pass S01 and S02 with interests.
7 Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps Pass Seven numbered steps.
8 Alternative/exception flows correctly reference <<include>>/<<extend>> use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 Pass No include/extend applies; stated.
9 Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text (Optional) Pass Rules listed for steps 2, 3b and 5.
10 Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories Pass Title and actor match UCD-001 and US-001.
11 Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated (Optional) Pass Level: user goal.
12 Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail Pass Goal wording, no UI or implementation detail.

Overall Verdict

Go — all applicable criteria pass. Reviewer and author are both S01: the project has a single participant, so the framework's author/reviewer separation cannot be met. S01 accepted this deviation when requesting acceptance (2026-10-04).

Action Items

Action Owner Due
None — —