# SQA Review Record: Stakeholder Analysis

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-04 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [a1ff735] |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder | Pass | S01–S03 all classified. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder has a unique, stable ID | Pass | S01, S02, S03. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context defined with explicit Power and Interest levels | Pass | Summary table. |
| 4 | Communication needs mapped to phases or milestones (Optional) | Pass | Communication Requirements table cites MIL-001 to MIL-004. |
| 5 | Conflicting interests identified with mitigation | Pass | One conflict (tooling versus simple repository), mitigated. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table cites O1–O5. |
| 7 | Concerns expressed in business language and FURPS+ (Optional) | Pass | FURPS+ mapping table. |
| 8 | Understandable by non-technical stakeholders (Optional) | Pass | Plain language, short document. |

## Overall Verdict

Go — all criteria pass. Reviewer and author are both S01: the project has a single participant, so the framework's author/reviewer separation cannot be met. S01 accepted this deviation when requesting acceptance (2026-10-04).

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | — | — |

---

[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[a1ff735]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/014-higher_lower/commit/a1ff73580fdcfad5bbb3854298fdfa0c16ada853