# SQA Review Record: UC-001 Use Case

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-009 |
| CrossReference | [UC-001], [QC-UC-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-04 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [UC-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-UC-001]

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario | N-A | Applies to the Brief format only; this use case is Fully Dressed. |
| 2 | Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure | N-A | Applies to the Casual format only; this use case is Fully Dressed. |
| 3 | All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows | Pass | Scope, level, actor, stakeholders, pre/postconditions, scenario, extensions, rules and open issues present. |
| 4 | Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined | Pass | Both defined. |
| 5 | Primary actor is explicitly stated | Pass | Player. |
| 6 | Stakeholders and their interests are stated | Pass | S01 and S02 with interests. |
| 7 | Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps | Pass | Seven numbered steps. |
| 8 | Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 | Pass | No include/extend applies; stated. |
| 9 | Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text (Optional) | Pass | Rules listed for steps 2, 3b and 5. |
| 10 | Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories | Pass | Title and actor match UCD-001 and US-001. |
| 11 | Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated (Optional) | Pass | Level: user goal. |
| 12 | Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail | Pass | Goal wording, no UI or implementation detail. |

## Overall Verdict

Go — all applicable criteria pass. Reviewer and author are both S01: the project has a single participant, so the framework's author/reviewer separation cannot be met. S01 accepted this deviation when requesting acceptance (2026-10-04).

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | — | — |

---

[UC-001]: ../../uc-001/uc.md
[QC-UC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-use-case.md