Accept UCD-001, US-001, UC-001 and SSD-001 after review

Review the use case chain for Play a Game (RC-007 to RC-010, all Go) and accept the four documents. Update the Traceability Matrix.
2026-10-04 23:48:42 +08:00
parent 462deba2a0
commit c7164feab1
10 changed files with 217 additions and 16 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+# SQA Review Record: UC-001 Use Case
+
+## Metadata
+| Key | Value |
+| --- | --- |
+| ID | RC-009 |
+| CrossReference | [UC-001], [QC-UC-001] |
+
+## Version History
+| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 2026-10-04 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
+
+---
+
+## Artifact Under Review
+
+- Instance reviewed: [UC-001]
+- Checklist used: [QC-UC-001]
+
+## Checklist Results
+
+| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 1 | Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario | N-A | Applies to the Brief format only; this use case is Fully Dressed. |
+| 2 | Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure | N-A | Applies to the Casual format only; this use case is Fully Dressed. |
+| 3 | All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows | Pass | Scope, level, actor, stakeholders, pre/postconditions, scenario, extensions, rules and open issues present. |
+| 4 | Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined | Pass | Both defined. |
+| 5 | Primary actor is explicitly stated | Pass | Player. |
+| 6 | Stakeholders and their interests are stated | Pass | S01 and S02 with interests. |
+| 7 | Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps | Pass | Seven numbered steps. |
+| 8 | Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 | Pass | No include/extend applies; stated. |
+| 9 | Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text (Optional) | Pass | Rules listed for steps 2, 3b and 5. |
+| 10 | Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories | Pass | Title and actor match UCD-001 and US-001. |
+| 11 | Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated (Optional) | Pass | Level: user goal. |
+| 12 | Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail | Pass | Goal wording, no UI or implementation detail. |
+
+## Overall Verdict
+
+Go — all applicable criteria pass. Reviewer and author are both S01: the project has a single participant, so the framework's author/reviewer separation cannot be met. S01 accepted this deviation when requesting acceptance (2026-10-04).
+
+## Action Items
+
+| Action | Owner | Due |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| None | — | — |
+
+---
+
+[UC-001]: ../../uc-001/uc.md
+[QC-UC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-use-case.md