Accept BC, SA, PP and MIL-001 after review

Review BC-001, SA-001, PP-001 and MIL-001 and record the results as
RC-001 to RC-004. All four verdicts are Go, so their Version History
rows become Accepted and the previous rows Deprecated. MIL-002 to
MIL-004 stay Proposed.

BC-001 failed criterion 1 (cost-benefit not justified as qualitative).
Add the justification and a target-completion constraint (2026-10-14)
that PP-001 and MIL-001 are checked against.

Add the Traceability Matrix (TM-001) and register RC and TM in the
artifact registry. PP has no QC checklist, so RC-003 checks the plan
against BC-001 and the milestones instead. Author and reviewer are
both S01, a deviation noted in each record.

Refs #5

docs/stakeholder-analysis.md

@@ -4,12 +4,13 @@
 | Key | Value |
 | --- | --- |
 | ID | SA-001 |
-| CrossReference | [BC-001], [PP-001] |
+| CrossReference | [BC-001], [PP-001], [RC-002] |
 
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| 2026-10-04 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [ddfe96f] |
+| 2026-10-04 | Deprecated | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [ddfe96f] |
+| 2026-10-04 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Accepted after review RC-002 | pending |
 
 ---
 
@@ -70,10 +71,11 @@ Identify who is affected by the Higher Lower project and what each needs, using
 
 | Stakeholder | Decision | Date |
 | --- | --- | --- |
-| S01 | Pending review | |
+| S01 | Go (RC-002) | 2026-10-04 |
 
 ---
 
 [BC-001]: ./business-case.md
 [PP-001]: ./project-plan.md
 [ddfe96f]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/014-higher_lower/commit/ddfe96ffa459d5e4b2e30d71bd53878aba2cfc5d
+[RC-002]: ./sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md