Accept BC, SA, PP and MIL-001 after review
Review BC-001, SA-001, PP-001 and MIL-001 and record the results as RC-001 to RC-004. All four verdicts are Go, so their Version History rows become Accepted and the previous rows Deprecated. MIL-002 to MIL-004 stay Proposed. BC-001 failed criterion 1 (cost-benefit not justified as qualitative). Add the justification and a target-completion constraint (2026-10-14) that PP-001 and MIL-001 are checked against. Add the Traceability Matrix (TM-001) and register RC and TM in the artifact registry. PP has no QC checklist, so RC-003 checks the plan against BC-001 and the milestones instead. Author and reviewer are both S01, a deviation noted in each record. Refs #5
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
# SQA Review Record: Project Plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
| Key | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ID | RC-003 |
|
||||
| CrossReference | [PP-001] |
|
||||
|
||||
## Version History
|
||||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 2026-10-04 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||||
|
||||
- Instance reviewed: [PP-001]
|
||||
- Checklist used: none exists for this type (`PP` has no QC checklist); criteria below follow `references/PP.md` "Validating".
|
||||
|
||||
## Checklist Results
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| 1 | Every MIL-* gateway is scheduled | Pass | MIL-001 to MIL-004 listed with window, decision date and owner. |
|
||||
| 2 | Schedule is consistent with the Business Case constraint | Pass | Ends 2026-10-14, matching the target-date constraint added to BC-001. |
|
||||
| 3 | Gateway Schedule, Gantt, Scope Coverage, Dependencies, Plan Risks and Open Issues sections are present | Pass | All required sections present. |
|
||||
| 4 | Each phase links to its synced Milestone | Pass | Milestones 36–39 linked. |
|
||||
| 5 | Every Business Case scope item maps to a gateway | Pass | Scope Coverage table. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
Go — no QC checklist exists for PP, so the plan was checked against BC-001 and the MIL-* documents. Open issues (README template, Python version, dates) remain listed in the plan. Reviewer and author are both S01: the project has a single participant, so the framework's author/reviewer separation cannot be met. S01 accepted this deviation when requesting acceptance (2026-10-04).
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Provide README template before MIL-004 task 1 | S01 | 2026-10-13 |
|
||||
| Confirm requires-python (>=3.13 or 3.14+) | S01 | 2026-10-06 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[PP-001]: ../../project-plan.md
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user