Create the Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis (S01 course participant, S02 Udemy coursists, S03 GitHub viewers), Project Plan and the milestone documents MIL-001 (project setup, 6 tasks) and MIL-002 (game implementation, 8 tasks) for the console Blackjack game. Register PP and MIL in the artifact registry, set the PO language to en, and link the synced Gitea milestones in the Gateway Schedule. Refs #1 Refs #2 Refs #3 Refs #4 Refs #5 Refs #6 Refs #7 Refs #8 Refs #9 Refs #10 Refs #11 Refs #12 Refs #13 Refs #14
2.7 KiB
2.7 KiB
@TITLE@
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | @ID@ |
| CrossReference | @CROSSREF@ |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @DATE@ | Accepted | @AUTHOR@ | Initial version | pending |
Purpose
Defines how this project applies Quality Criteria (QC) checklists to real artifact instances, producing SQA Review Records and Go/No-Go decisions.
ARB Review Workflow
- Submission — the artifact owner submits an instance for review,
identifying its type's QC checklist (
framework/qc/qc-*.md). - QC Checklist Review — the assigned reviewer (see RACI) applies the checklist criterion by criterion.
- Review Record — the reviewer documents the outcome as an SQA Review
Record (
RC-*underdocs/sqa/reviews/). - Go/No-Go Decision — the Accountable role for the artifact category decides; contested or cross-cutting cases escalate to the ARB Chair.
- Sign-off — on Go, the artifact's
## Version Historygets anAcceptedrow (the previous row becomesDeprecated). On Go-with-conditions, status staysProposeduntil the Action Items are closed. On No-Go, the artifact returns to its owner. - Traceability Update — the Traceability Matrix is updated with the
instance and its
RC-*reference.
RACI by Artifact Category
Fill every cell with stakeholder IDs from the Stakeholder Analysis (S<NN>),
never role names.
| Artifact Category | Responsible (runs the review) | Accountable (Go/No-Go owner) | Consulted | Informed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic (Stakeholder Analysis, Business Case, BMC) | S | S | S | S |
| Process/Business (BPMN, KPI, Milestones/Gateways) | S | S | S | S |
| Requirements (Use Case Diagram, User Story, Use Case) | S | S | S | S |
| Modeling/Design (Domain Model, SSD, Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, DCD, ERD) | S | S | S | S |
Cross-cutting escalations and disputed verdicts are Accountable to the ARB
Chair (S<NN>), overriding the category-level Accountable role.
Escalation Rules
- A No-Go verdict, or any disagreement between the Responsible reviewer and the category's Accountable owner, escalates to the ARB Chair.
- A reviewer may not review an instance they authored.
- Repeated No-Go verdicts (2 or more) on the same artifact type trigger a
review of the corresponding
QC-*checklist itself.
Cadence
- Reviews are triggered per artifact instance as it is produced or revised.
- QC checklists are reviewed annually.
@LINKS@