Files
011-black-jack/.agents/skills/artifact/templates/GOV.md
T
Tirsvad 1d35410b8d Add planning baseline: BC, SA, PP and two gateways
Create the Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis (S01 course participant,
S02 Udemy coursists, S03 GitHub viewers), Project Plan and the milestone
documents MIL-001 (project setup, 6 tasks) and MIL-002 (game
implementation, 8 tasks) for the console Blackjack game.

Register PP and MIL in the artifact registry, set the PO language to en,
and link the synced Gitea milestones in the Gateway Schedule.

Refs #1
Refs #2
Refs #3
Refs #4
Refs #5
Refs #6
Refs #7
Refs #8
Refs #9
Refs #10
Refs #11
Refs #12
Refs #13
Refs #14
2026-10-04 21:38:09 +08:00

2.7 KiB

@TITLE@

Metadata

Key Value
ID @ID@
CrossReference @CROSSREF@

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
@DATE@ Accepted @AUTHOR@ Initial version pending

Purpose

Defines how this project applies Quality Criteria (QC) checklists to real artifact instances, producing SQA Review Records and Go/No-Go decisions.

ARB Review Workflow

  1. Submission — the artifact owner submits an instance for review, identifying its type's QC checklist (framework/qc/qc-*.md).
  2. QC Checklist Review — the assigned reviewer (see RACI) applies the checklist criterion by criterion.
  3. Review Record — the reviewer documents the outcome as an SQA Review Record (RC-* under docs/sqa/reviews/).
  4. Go/No-Go Decision — the Accountable role for the artifact category decides; contested or cross-cutting cases escalate to the ARB Chair.
  5. Sign-off — on Go, the artifact's ## Version History gets an Accepted row (the previous row becomes Deprecated). On Go-with-conditions, status stays Proposed until the Action Items are closed. On No-Go, the artifact returns to its owner.
  6. Traceability Update — the Traceability Matrix is updated with the instance and its RC-* reference.

RACI by Artifact Category

Fill every cell with stakeholder IDs from the Stakeholder Analysis (S<NN>), never role names.

Artifact Category Responsible (runs the review) Accountable (Go/No-Go owner) Consulted Informed
Strategic (Stakeholder Analysis, Business Case, BMC) S S S S
Process/Business (BPMN, KPI, Milestones/Gateways) S S S S
Requirements (Use Case Diagram, User Story, Use Case) S S S S
Modeling/Design (Domain Model, SSD, Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, DCD, ERD) S S S S

Cross-cutting escalations and disputed verdicts are Accountable to the ARB Chair (S<NN>), overriding the category-level Accountable role.

Escalation Rules

  • A No-Go verdict, or any disagreement between the Responsible reviewer and the category's Accountable owner, escalates to the ARB Chair.
  • A reviewer may not review an instance they authored.
  • Repeated No-Go verdicts (2 or more) on the same artifact type trigger a review of the corresponding QC-* checklist itself.

Cadence

  • Reviews are triggered per artifact instance as it is produced or revised.
  • QC checklists are reviewed annually.

@LINKS@