SQA Review Record

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-003
CrossReference	PP-001, QC-PP-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-28	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S02	Review record, full review	50e8331

Artifact Under Review

Instance reviewed: PP-001
Checklist used: QC-PP-001 (QC-PP-001)
Scope: full review
Language and domain: en / it
Language reviewer: none
Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S02)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The plan states its start date, end date and the constraint it must fit	Pass	Purpose and Planning Assumptions state the window 2026-10-28 to 2026-11-06 and that the Business Case sets no deadline.
2	Every milestone or gateway is listed once with its document, decision date and owner	Pass	Gateway Schedule lists MIL-001 to MIL-008 once each with document link, decision date and owner S01.
3	Every decision date lies inside the plan's window and is consistent with the dates in the linked `MIL-*` document	Pass	Decision dates equal the Target Date of each MIL document and lie inside the window.
4	Every in-scope item of the Business Case is delivered at a named gateway (scope coverage)	Pass	Scope Coverage maps every In Scope item to a gateway.
5	Dependencies between gateways are stated, acyclic and consistent with the schedule order	Pass	Dependencies show the chain MIL-001 to MIL-008; the schedule order agrees.
6	The plan states what happens to later gateways and to the end date when a gateway is No-Go	Pass	Dependencies state that a No-Go stops later gateways and that S01 decides a move of the end date.
7	Owners, reviewers and escalation roles use Stakeholder Analysis IDs and match the governance RACI	Pass	Owner S01 and reviewer S02 come from SA-001; no governance document exists in this project.
8	Planning assumptions are listed with their source, and a changed baseline is recorded with its reason	Pass	Planning Assumptions list their source; no baseline was changed.
9	Plan risks are listed with impact and a mitigation, and trace to Business Case risks where they come from there	Pass	Plan Risks has four risks with impact and mitigation, linked to the Business Case risks.
10	Open issues are listed, and none contradicts a statement elsewhere in the plan	Pass	Open Issues lists the repository question, the missing deadline and the acceptance note; none contradicts the plan.
11	Each gateway's main deliverable is stated and matches the deliverable of its `MIL-*` document	Pass	Main deliverables in the schedule match the Deliverable section of each MIL document.
12	Gateways that deliver user stories name them, and those that do not say why	Pass	Planning Assumptions say stories are skipped (ADR-0001); the Stories column says why for each gateway.
13	The schedule view (table, Gantt) and the dependency view agree with each other	Pass	The Gantt bars and the table dates are the same; the chain matches the dependency list.
14	Each gateway is linked to its issue-tracker milestone, or marked as not yet synced	N-A	No Milestones exist on the git host yet; the Milestone column is blank on purpose until the publish workflow runs.
15	The plan is a singleton: one Project Plan per project, changes recorded in Version History	Pass	PP-001 is the only Project Plan; the change is in Version History.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Metadata has `Language` = en and `Domain` = it.
2	`Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	`en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	All prose and table cells of PP-001 are English (stand-in assessment, see the verdict).
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register of the type is given in the registry (Languages); the text keeps to it.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	Terms follow DICT-001: bot, booking, lecture step (stand-in assessment, see the verdict).
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7	No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document	Pass	No translated twin exists in `docs/`.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	N-A	First version; no language change.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	The stand-in reviewer reads English and checked the IT terms in context (stand-in assessment, see the verdict).
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	Abbreviations are spelled out or defined where first used, or are the framework's own IDs.

Overall Verdict

Go — PP-001 meets every Mandatory criterion. No blocking finding. The review is not independent: the AI authored and reviewed it as stand-in for S02, and S01 can challenge it in the end-of-run summary. Criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 were assessed by the stand-in only; the framework would hold them Pending for an independent language reviewer. S01 is asked to confirm them in the end-of-run summary. The plan is accepted by S01 through the chat acceptance of the plan.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	-

6.1 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History