SQA Review Record

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-001
CrossReference	BC-001, QC-BC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-28	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S02	Review record, full review	50e8331

Artifact Under Review

Instance reviewed: BC-001
Checklist used: QC-BC-001 (QC-BC-001)
Scope: full review
Language and domain: en / it
Language reviewer: none
Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S02)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified	Pass	Cost–Benefit Assessment is qualitative and states why: unpaid learning project, no revenue.
2	Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation	Pass	Risks table: six risks, each with impact and mitigation.
3	Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations	Pass	Success Criteria: nine rows with numeric targets and a measure.
4	Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope	Pass	Scope has In Scope and Out of Scope subsections.
5	Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline	Pass	Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 from SA-001.
6	Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman)	Pass	Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010 and Clean Architecture.
7	Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another	Pass	Assumptions and Constraints are separate lists.
8	Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation	Pass	Recommendation: Proceed, with one rationale sentence.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Metadata has `Language` = en and `Domain` = it.
2	`Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	`en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	All prose and table cells of BC-001 are English (stand-in assessment, see the verdict).
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register of the type is given in the registry (Languages); the text keeps to it.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	Terms follow DICT-001: bot, booking, class card, lecture step, waitlist, retry, profile (stand-in assessment, see the verdict).
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7	No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document	Pass	No translated twin exists in `docs/`.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	N-A	First version; no language change.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	The stand-in reviewer reads English and checked the IT terms in context (stand-in assessment, see the verdict).
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	Abbreviations are spelled out or defined where first used, or are the framework's own IDs.

Overall Verdict

Go — BC-001 meets every Mandatory criterion. No blocking finding. The review is not independent: the AI authored and reviewed it as stand-in for S02, and S01 can challenge it in the end-of-run summary. Criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 were assessed by the stand-in only; the framework would hold them Pending for an independent language reviewer. S01 is asked to confirm them in the end-of-run summary.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	-

4.5 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History Unescape Escape