4.8 KiB
4.8 KiB
SQA Review Record
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | SA-001, QC-SA-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | 96a9a78 |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: SA-001
- Checklist used: QC-SA-001 and QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
- Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 in chat on 2026-10-28)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01; the language criteria were confirmed by S01 in person)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | All three stakeholders have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01, S02, S03 are unique; the document states IDs are stable. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organization, power level and interest level are in the summary table. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication Requirements table maps channel, frequency, deliverable and phase. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | One conflict (S03 no dependencies against the Selenium requirement) with a mitigation. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability Analysis maps S01 to O1-O3, S02 to O2-O4, S03 to O4-O5 of [BC-001]. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Concern register maps every concern to a FURPS+ attribute. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short plain-language tables; each stakeholder entry is one row. |
| 9 | Every concern has a stable ID (CN-NNN) in the concern register, with the stakeholder who raised it; IDs are never renumbered or reused |
Pass | CN-001 to CN-007 each name the raising stakeholder. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata has Language en and Domain it. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code and it is in the registry domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (named human reviewer); content is English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register: IT Professional English. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28: terms are ordinary IT terms and no dictionary exists or is needed. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Headings, keys, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No translated twin exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version; no earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | S01, competent in English and in IT, confirmed the domain terms in chat on 2026-10-28. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CPS, GUI, FURPS+, ADR) are spelled out at first use. |
Overall Verdict
Go - no Mandatory criterion failed and none is Pending; the language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01. Stand-in review, not independent.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | S01 | - |