Files
2026-10-28 16:23:33 +08:00

5.9 KiB

SQA Review Record

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-003
CrossReference PP-001, QC-PP-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-28 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen AI as stand-in for S01 Initial version 96a9a78

Artifact Under Review

  • Instance reviewed: PP-001
  • Checklist used: QC-PP-001 and QC-LANG-001
  • Scope: full review
  • Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
  • Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 in chat on 2026-10-28)
  • Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01; the language criteria were confirmed by S01 in person)

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 The plan states its start date, end date and the constraint it must fit Pass Planning Assumptions state start 2026-10-28 and end 2026-11-04 per the one-week Business Case constraint.
2 Every milestone or gateway is listed once with its document, decision date and owner Pass Five gateway rows, each linking its MIL document, decision date and owner S01.
3 Every decision date lies inside the plan's window and is consistent with the dates in the linked MIL-* document Pass Decision dates 2026-10-29, 10-30, 10-31, 11-02, 11-04 equal the Target Date of MIL-001 to MIL-005 and lie inside the window.
4 Every in-scope item of the Business Case is delivered at a named gateway (scope coverage) Pass Scope Coverage table maps every In Scope item to a gateway.
5 Dependencies between gateways are stated, acyclic and consistent with the schedule order Pass Chain MIL-001 to MIL-005 is acyclic and matches the schedule order.
6 The plan states what happens to later gateways and to the end date when a gateway is No-Go Pass Dependencies section says a No-Go returns the phase to its owner, later gateways move, and S01 alone decides an end-date move.
7 Owners, reviewers and escalation roles use Stakeholder Analysis IDs and match the governance RACI N-A No governance document is in scope of [BC-001]; all owners use the SA ID S01, matching the MIL Ownership tables.
8 Planning assumptions are listed with their source, and a changed baseline is recorded with its reason Pass Planning Assumptions list start, length, reviewer stand-in and cadence with sources.
9 Plan risks are listed with impact and a mitigation, and trace to Business Case risks where they come from there Pass Plan Risks have impact and mitigation; two trace to Business Case risks.
10 Open issues are listed, and none contradicts a statement elsewhere in the plan Pass Open Issues name the repository-name difference and the earlier solution; neither contradicts the plan.
11 Each gateway's main deliverable is stated and matches the deliverable of its MIL-* document Pass Main deliverable column matches each MIL Deliverable.
12 Gateways that deliver user stories name them, and those that do not say why Pass Stories column says 'none (technical tasks)'.
13 The schedule view (table, Gantt) and the dependency view agree with each other Pass Gantt bars and the table use the same dates; the chain matches the dependency list.
14 Each gateway is linked to its issue-tracker milestone, or marked as not yet synced Pass Milestone column is blank because no sync has happened yet.
15 The plan is a singleton: one Project Plan per project, changes recorded in Version History Pass Single plan file docs/project-plan.md with one Version History row.

Language and Domain Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder Pass Metadata has Language en and Domain it.
2 Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list Pass en is a BCP 47 code and it is in the registry domain list.
3 The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language Pass Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (named human reviewer); content is English.
4 The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type Pass Register: IT Executive English.
5 Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms Pass Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28: terms are ordinary IT terms and no dictionary exists or is needed.
6 Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English Pass Headings, keys, IDs and statuses are English.
7 No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document Pass No translated twin exists.
8 A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again N-A First version; no earlier accepted version.
9 A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly Pass S01, competent in English and in IT, confirmed the domain terms in chat on 2026-10-28.
10 Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language Pass Abbreviations (CPS, GUI, FURPS+, ADR) are spelled out at first use.

Overall Verdict

Go - no Mandatory criterion failed and none is Pending; the language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01. Stand-in review, not independent.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
None S01 -