# SQA Review Record ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-002 | | CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [96a9a78] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [SA-001] - Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] and [QC-LANG-001] - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows) - Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 in chat on 2026-10-28) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the language criteria were confirmed by S01 in person) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | All three stakeholders have Power, Interest and Quadrant. | | 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01, S02, S03 are unique; the document states IDs are stable. | | 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organization, power level and interest level are in the summary table. | | 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication Requirements table maps channel, frequency, deliverable and phase. | | 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | One conflict (S03 no dependencies against the Selenium requirement) with a mitigation. | | 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability Analysis maps S01 to O1-O3, S02 to O2-O4, S03 to O4-O5 of [BC-001]. | | 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Concern register maps every concern to a FURPS+ attribute. | | 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short plain-language tables; each stakeholder entry is one row. | | 9 | Every concern has a stable ID (`CN-NNN`) in the concern register, with the stakeholder who raised it; IDs are never renumbered or reused | Pass | CN-001 to CN-007 each name the raising stakeholder. | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has Language en and Domain it. | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | en is a BCP 47 code and it is in the registry domain list. | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (named human reviewer); content is English. | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register: IT Professional English. | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28: terms are ordinary IT terms and no dictionary exists or is needed. | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Headings, keys, IDs and statuses are English. | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists. | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version; no earlier accepted version. | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | S01, competent in English and in IT, confirmed the domain terms in chat on 2026-10-28. | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CPS, GUI, FURPS+, ADR) are spelled out at first use. | ## Overall Verdict Go - no Mandatory criterion failed and none is Pending; the language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01. Stand-in review, not independent. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | None | S01 | - | --- [SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md [QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md [96a9a78]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/048-the-coockie-factory/commit/96a9a78f010ce8ae3fce8d84602317d8b5808a13