# RC-003 Review of PP-001 ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-003 | | CrossReference | [PP-001], [QC-PP-001], [QC-LANG-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Claude (AI) | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version: Go | [b344b6e] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [PP-001] - Checklist used: [QC-PP-001] and [QC-LANG-001] - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows) - Language reviewer: none (S01 reads the language and knows the domain; the stand-in applies S01's role) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The plan states its start date, end date and the constraint it must fit | Pass | Start 2026-10-28, end 2026-11-02; the Business Case has no deadline, which the plan says. | | 2 | Every milestone or gateway is listed once with its document, decision date and owner | Pass | Five gateways, each with document, decision date and owner S01, each linking to its `MIL-*`. | | 3 | Every decision date lies inside the plan's window and is consistent with the dates in the linked `MIL-*` document | Pass | Decision dates in the plan equal the Target Date in each `MIL-*` and lie inside the window. | | 4 | Every in-scope item of the Business Case is delivered at a named gateway (scope coverage) | Pass | Scope Coverage maps every In Scope item to a gateway. | | 5 | Dependencies between gateways are stated, acyclic and consistent with the schedule order | Pass | Dependency chain MIL-001 to MIL-005 is acyclic and follows the schedule order. | | 6 | The plan states what happens to later gateways and to the end date when a gateway is No-Go | Pass | Plan states that a No-Go moves later gateways and the end date, and that S01 decides. | | 7 | Owners, reviewers and escalation roles use Stakeholder Analysis IDs and match the governance RACI | Pass | Owners are S01; no governance document exists in this project, so there is no RACI to contradict. | | 8 | Planning assumptions are listed with their source, and a changed baseline is recorded with its reason | Pass | Planning Assumptions give their source. | | 9 | Plan risks are listed with impact and a mitigation, and trace to Business Case risks where they come from there | Pass | Plan Risks have impact and mitigation and cite the Business Case risks they come from. | | 10 | Open issues are listed, and none contradicts a statement elsewhere in the plan | Pass | Open Issues are current and do not contradict the plan. | | 11 | Each gateway's main deliverable is stated and matches the deliverable of its `MIL-*` document | Pass | Each deliverable matches the Deliverable of its `MIL-*`. | | 12 | Gateways that deliver user stories name them, and those that do not say why | Pass | Stories column says "none (technical tasks)". | | 13 | The schedule view (table, Gantt) and the dependency view agree with each other | Pass | Gantt bars and the table agree; the chain matches the dependency list. | | 14 | Each gateway is linked to its issue-tracker milestone, or marked as not yet synced | Pass | Each gateway is marked `not yet synced`. | | 15 | The plan is a singleton: one Project Plan per project, changes recorded in Version History | Pass | One Project Plan; Version History present. | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`. | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; quoted file names and code stay as they are. | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Executive English. as the registry says for this type. | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No domain dictionary exists yet, so no PO term can contradict one; the IT terms used (Selenium, CSS selector, Docker, headless, driver) are standard and used with one word per concept. Stand-in judgement, open to challenge. | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin file exists beside the document. | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; language and domain have not changed. | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by `AI as stand-in for S01` (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain, as the registry states). Not independent; open to challenge in the end-of-run summary. | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations used (CSS, API, PNG, FURPS+, e2e) are spelled out on first use where they appear. | ## Overall Verdict Go — Every Mandatory criterion of the type checklist and of QC-LANG-001 passes; no Fail. Stand-in review as `AI as stand-in for S01`, not independent: S01 can challenge it in the end-of-run summary. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | None | S01 | n/a | --- [PP-001]: ../../project-plan.md [QC-PP-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-project-plan.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md [b344b6e]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/048-scrapping-wiki/commit/b344b6e2cba397e23714c73a45ad4155bb1e00e0