4.1 KiB
4.1 KiB
RC-009 MIL-006 review
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-009 |
| CrossReference | MIL-006, QC-MIL-001, QC-LANG-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | f9765fd |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-006
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 and QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the domain IT; mode: AI as stand-in for S01)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (AI as stand-in for S01); the author and the stand-in are both the AI working for S01
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names concrete output (merged branch with listed files or pages) |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go / No-Go table has objectively checkable criteria |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table names the predecessor or says it has none |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability names the Business Case objective(s) |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner and approving reviewer are S01 |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date is inside 2026-10-28 to 2026-11-04, the Project Plan window |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata has `Language |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is BCP 47; it is in the registry domain list |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the stand-in reads English |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Executive types use IT Executive English, technical types IT Professional English, as the registry says; plain sentences, no jargon beyond IT terms |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (DICT) exists in this project; terms are used consistently (price, target price, alert, gateway) and no synonyms for them were found |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No <name>.<language>.md twin exists |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no language change since an earlier accepted version |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The stand-in reads English and knows the IT domain; not independent of the author (recorded in Mode) |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (SMTP, CAPTCHA, ROI, API, QC, ISO/IEC) are spelled out on first use |
Overall Verdict
Go — all criteria pass.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None: no Fail and no Pending criterion | S01 | 2026-10-28 |