046-scraping-the-billboard/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-sa.md

Review of SA-001

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-002
CrossReference	SA-001, QC-SA-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-28	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	01e016e

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: SA-001
• Checklist used: QC-SA-001 (QC-SA-001)
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5, 9 in chat on 2026-10-28)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries	Pass	All three stakeholders have Power, Interest and Quadrant.
2	Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts	Pass	IDs S01 to S03 are stable and used by every other artifact.
3	Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description	Pass	Roles, organization and explicit HIGH/LOW levels given.
4	Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones	Pass	Communication table C1 to C3 tied to milestones.
5	Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies	Pass	Two conflicts with mitigations.
6	Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives	Pass	Business Goal Alignment table traces each concern to BC-001 objectives.
7	Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+)	Pass	Concerns CN-001 to CN-006 mapped to FURPS+ attributes.
8	Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry	Pass	Short plain text; each entry readable on its own.
9	Every concern has a stable ID (CN-NNN) in the concern register, with the stakeholder who raised it; IDs are never renumbered or reused	Pass	CN-001 to CN-006 each name the stakeholder who raised it.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Language en and Domain it are in Metadata.
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	en is BCP 47; it is in the registry domain list.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (the document is English prose).
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register IT Executive English or IT Professional English per the registry table.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28; no dictionary (DICT) exists yet, so the terms are the standard IT terms.
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	No translated twin exists.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	Pass	First version; no language change.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (S01 is the domain expert and reads English).
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	Abbreviations are spelled out at first use (PO, ARB, QC, FURPS+).

Overall Verdict

Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; no blocking finding. Language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28, so none stays Pending.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	-

---