# Review of PP-001 ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-003 | | CrossReference | [PP-001], [QC-PP-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [01e016e] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [PP-001] - Checklist used: [QC-PP-001] (`QC-PP-001`) - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it - Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5, 9 in chat on 2026-10-28) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The plan states its start date, end date and the constraint it must fit | Pass | Planning Assumptions give start 2026-10-28 and end 2026-11-30, the Business Case window. | | 2 | Every milestone or gateway is listed once with its document, decision date and owner | Pass | Seven rows, each with its `MIL-*` link, decision date and owner S01. | | 3 | Every decision date lies inside the plan's window and is consistent with the dates in the linked `MIL-*` document | Pass | Decision dates equal the Target Date of each linked MIL document and lie inside the window. | | 4 | Every in-scope item of the Business Case is delivered at a named gateway (scope coverage) | Pass | Scope Coverage table maps every In Scope item to a gateway. | | 5 | Dependencies between gateways are stated, acyclic and consistent with the schedule order | Pass | Chain MIL-001 to MIL-007 is acyclic and matches the dates. | | 6 | The plan states what happens to later gateways and to the end date when a gateway is No-Go | Pass | Dependencies section states the effect of a No-Go and that S01 moves the end date. | | 7 | Owners, reviewers and escalation roles use Stakeholder Analysis IDs and match the governance RACI | Pass | Only S01 is named, matching the GOV-001 RACI. | | 8 | Planning assumptions are listed with their source, and a changed baseline is recorded with its reason | Pass | Planning Assumptions list sources; the `browser.json` assumption is explicit. | | 9 | Plan risks are listed with impact and a mitigation, and trace to Business Case risks where they come from there | Pass | Plan Risks have impact and mitigation; the first traces to the Business Case browser.json risk. | | 10 | Open issues are listed, and none contradicts a statement elsewhere in the plan | Pass | Open Issues list the owner name difference and the browser.json dependency; no contradiction. | | 11 | Each gateway's main deliverable is stated and matches the deliverable of its `MIL-*` document | Pass | Main deliverable column is the first clause of each MIL Deliverable. | | 12 | Gateways that deliver user stories name them, and those that do not say why | Pass | Stories column says `none (technical tasks)`. | | 13 | The schedule view (table, Gantt) and the dependency view agree with each other | Pass | Gantt bars use the table dates. | | 14 | Each gateway is linked to its issue-tracker milestone, or marked as not yet synced | Pass | Milestone column says `not yet synced`. | | 15 | The plan is a singleton: one Project Plan per project, changes recorded in Version History | Pass | One Project Plan, PP-001. | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Language `en` and Domain `it` are in Metadata. | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list. | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (the document is English prose). | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register `IT Executive English` or `IT Professional English` per the registry table. | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28; no dictionary (DICT) exists yet, so the terms are the standard IT terms. | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists. | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no language change. | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (S01 is the domain expert and reads English). | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out at first use (PO, ARB, QC, FURPS+). | ## Overall Verdict Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; no blocking finding. Language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28, so none stays `Pending`. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | None | S01 | - | --- [PP-001]: ../../project-plan.md [QC-PP-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-project-plan.md [01e016e]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/046-scraping-the-billboard/commit/01e016e15dd93cface4f4ae9e9e99919e0aace2b